Skip to main content

McGaffigan to Leave NRC

Just off the wire from NRC:
NRC COMMISSIONER EDWARD McGAFFIGAN TO LEAVE AGENCY

ROCKVILLE, MD – Nuclear Regulatory Commission member Edward McGaffigan, Jr., a 31-year veteran of public service and member of the Commission since 1996, announced today he will leave the regulatory body upon the confirmation of a successor.

McGaffigan, 59, announced his intention in letters to President Bush and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev, dated Jan. 4, 2007. The longest-serving member in the NRC’s 32-year history and the only member to have served over 10 years, McGaffigan is undergoing treatment for metastatic melanoma.

“Ed McGaffigan has made exceptionally valuable contributions to the work of the NRC over the past decade. Our thoughts and prayers are with him and his family,” said NRC Chairman Dale Klein.
For a look back at McGaffigan's career, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

That's what we need right now--the commissioner with the most experience and the one with his head squarest on his shoulders leaving.

IIRC, this is the second vacancy in the last three months, coming right before the first COL applications. Would it not also leave Jaczko as the longest-serving commissioner? Wonderful time for this to happen.

Prepare for a logjam as the lawyers pick off each "second bandwagon market" nuke as it comes out of the government meat grinder.
Paul Primavera said…
I think you'll regret having ingratiated yourselves with the Democrats. Yes, some are pro-nuclear and to be commended, but they are in the minority and they don't control the party. Rather, people like Ed Markey, Dennis Kucinich, Barbara Boxer, Charles Rangel, Rita Lowey, etc., will hold sway and we can expect at least one more commissioner (possibly two if and when Merrifield leaves) like Jaczko who always complains to the anti-nukes that he is just one lone commissioner.

With Pelosi and Reid in charge, it'll be a miracle even if current plants like IPEC and VY get license extension, let alone new ones built.
Starvid, Sweden said…
Uh... do you let politicians run your nuclear safety bureau?

The thought of doing that chills me to the bone.
Ruth Sponsler said…
I can understand why McGaffigan is leaving - he is seriously ill.

I don't undertand why Merrifield wants to leave in June.

Jaczko started his term four days before Lyons did, so Stewart is correct.

I hope that solid candidates are named to replace McGaffigan, and then [in June] Merrifield.

This is one matter where I believe that Bush needs to appoint technically competent, but forthright people. Bush's appointees should have a track record of both competence and also support for nuclear energy.

I certainly don't want to hear about any more "old chums" or "ideologues" being appointed - I remember too well the situations with Michael Brown [FEMA and the botched Katrina situation] and the Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination.

I don't trust Bush's judgment on the NRC completely....Jaczko was a Bush nominee with a proven track record of opinion against Yucca Mountain. Clinton didn't give us Jaczko...Bush did.

If the Senate gives any partisan fight over a ~well-qualified~ nominee for NRC Commissioner, I believe that the Republicans and the talk radio guys should definitely make an issue out of the matter.

By the way, I say this as a political independent. I side with the Dems on a few issues [mostly economic stuff like the minimum wage], but I have a lot of problems with the California and Northeastern Dems' policies on nuclear energy [and other issues not relevant to the work of the NRC].

I don't want to see Harry Reid, Barbara Boxer etc. to have undue influence in the choice of NRC Commissioners. I would like Democrats who are favorable to nuclear energy to use their input to help select candidates who are committed to nuclear energy but can work with constructive members of both parties.
Anonymous said…
John Breaux would be a good choice, if he could be persuaded to take it. The Dems would have a hard time voting against one of their own ex-Senators. If there is another opening, select someone from academia and/or with national lab experience. John Marburger might fit the bill. Just say no to Ernie Muniz. His role in the HFBR debacle is just too much of an albatross.
Paul Primavera said…
Horray for Ruth Sponsler. Now there's a person with a lot of common sense!
Paul Primavera said…
I just wanted to clarify something Ruth wrote which I should have noticed before (but I still stand behind my hooray for her):

"I don't trust Bush's judgment on the NRC completely....Jaczko was a Bush nominee with a proven track record of opinion against Yucca Mountain. Clinton didn't give us Jaczko...Bush did."

The fact is that Harry Reid wasn't going to allow any NRC appointee to go through the Senate unless his and Rep. Markey's lackey - Jaczko - got appointed. So in a deal with Reid, Bush agreed to appoint ONE person whom Reid had hand-picked and that was Jaczko who had worked for Reid and before that for anti-nuclear Markey in the Congress. To balance this out, Dominici - a Republican - required that Lyons (a pro-nuke guy) get appointed. And that is exactly what Bush did.

So we ended up with a balance between anti-nuke Jaczko and pro-nuke Lyons. The settlement was purely political with Democrat Reid and Republican Dominici.

Thus, don't go blaming Bush.

True, I don't think he understands the technical qualifications that should go into a Commissioner, but Reid and Markey don't either, nor do they wish to.

Dominici, however, DOES understand and that's why we now have the balance between Jaczko and Lyons. At least in that Bush had the wisdom to listen to Dominici when his arm was being wrung by Reid.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why Nuclear Plant Closures Are a Crisis for Small Town USA

Nuclear plants occupy an unusual spot in the towns where they operate: integral but so much in the background that they may seem almost invisible. But when they close, it can be like the earth shifting underfoot.

Lohud.com, the Gannett newspaper that covers the Lower Hudson Valley in New York, took a look around at the experience of towns where reactors have closed, because the Indian Point reactors in Buchanan are scheduled to be shut down under an agreement with Gov. Mario Cuomo.


From sea to shining sea, it was dismal. It wasn’t just the plant employees who were hurt. The losses of hundreds of jobs, tens of millions of dollars in payrolls and millions in property taxes depressed whole towns and surrounding areas. For example:

Vernon, Vermont, home to Vermont Yankee for more than 40 years, had to cut its municipal budget in half. The town closed its police department and let the county take over; the youth sports teams lost their volunteer coaches, and Vernon Elementary School lost th…