Skip to main content

Breaking Bread with a Pro-Nuclear Blogger

It's been a busy week filled with meetings and other responsibilities that have kept me away from blogging, but I wanted to take a few moments to write about a lunch meeting that my colleague David Bradish and I had earlier today with N Nadir, the famous pro-nuclear blogger who conducts his business over at Daily Kos.

As many of our readers know, we've been pointing to Nadir's (not his real name) posts at DailyKos for some time now, at times astonished at the sort of support nuclear energy can enjoy at a traditionally progressive blog like that one.

Then again, Nadir told me he wasn't surprised, as has been seeing a movement of a number of Democrats and others of a progressive political stripe give nuclear energy a second, and enthusiastic look.

We had a very interesting lunch, and Nadir passed along some advice that I'm sure to take to heart when it comes to confronting our industry's foes. In particular, Nadir made it clear that we needed to be more, not less confrontational, and just a bit more edgy when it comes to our presentation.

Simply put, he gave us a lot to think about, and I hope we did too.

It was great to take the jump and meet Nadir face-to-face as we have with Rod Adams and John Wheeler. Here's hoping we might do it again soon with another member of the nuclear energy community online.

Comments

Randal Leavitt said…
You may be interested in my blog too:

http://positiveenergy.blogspot.com/

(No need to publish this comment. I just wanted to let you know about the above URL.)
Rod Adams said…
Eric:

You and your readers might be interested in hearing the most recent episode of The Atomic Show Podcast. The evening before NNadir visited with you in Washington, he dropped by Atomic HQ for a chat about a Liberal View of Atomic Energy.

Like you, we also had a fascinating conversation about how to tell our story and how to respond to people who are focused on spreading anti-nuclear rubbish.

I gave you full credit for introducing us through NEI Nuclear Notes. You are providing a great service as the hub of the pro-nuclear blogging community.
Anonymous said…
Why would any one be astonished to see support for nuclear power at a progressive website? What could be more progressive than support for nuclear power, and what could be more regressive than opposition to nuclear power?
don kosloff said…
The word "progressive" used in the description of the Kos website is the codeword used by radical leftists to identify themselves without alarming people who are not poltical junkies.
Anonymous said…
Yes, I understand the use of the word "progressive" at DailyKos. I had my tongue firmly in cheek when I made my original comment. Using the actual definition of the word progressive, however, it is fair to say that nothing is more progressive than nuclear power.
Ohadi Langis said…
If you plan to visit Yellowstone or Grand Teton National Parks this summer, we're just two hours south of Yellowstone or the same travel time east of Jackson, WY.

Visitors to Idaho Falls, ID, are welcome anytime to discuss nuclear issues. See us on the web at: http://djysrv.blogspot.com
Idaho Samizdat Nuke Notes
Anonymous said…
"the codeword used by radical leftists to identify themselves without alarming people who are not poltical junkies."

In much the same way that extremely radical right-wing causes label themselves as "conservative"
don kosloff said…
Anonymous asserted, "In much the same way that extremely radical right-wing causes label themselves as 'conservative'"

That would have hardly any effect because all conservatives are considered to support extremely radical right wing causes.

Popular posts from this blog

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…