Skip to main content

Toshiba Close to Deal With NRG on Texas Reactors

By Eric McErlain
Details from Reuters.
Labels:

Comments

Anonymous said…
So much for competition in the US. Any chance that Toshiba will also be building Areva EPRs in the US? I smell anti-trust lawsuits due to unfair competitive practices.
June 27, 2007 at 5:52 PM
Stewart Peterson said…
How's that an unfair practice? They could have signed a contract with Areva and gotten full life-cycle services just as easily.
June 28, 2007 at 12:36 AM
Anonymous said…
They are getting all of the AP1000 sales in the US (12 reactors at 6 sites from a COL standpoint), not to mention the four AP1000 sales in China, and now they are getting two of the BWR sales in the US (2 reactors at 1 site). Thus far, GE is only left with ESBWR sales in the US (3 reactors at 3 sites), unless Toshiba comes in and sells those to Entergy and Dominion at razor thin margins just to run GE out of town. The US will be dominated by Toshiba in the nuclear world. Everyone else will be striving to be "Apple" at best in terms of market share. Toshiba is too large with too much market power at this stage.
June 29, 2007 at 5:41 PM
Anonymous said…
Isn't it ironic that after spending so much money to aquire Westinghouse, the first reactor that Toshiba may build is a GE design?
July 3, 2007 at 4:35 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap
1 comment
Read more

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

By
Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu
Post a Comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin
Post a Comment
Read more