Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
Former blog for NEI featuring news and commentary on the commercial nuclear energy industry. Head to NEI.org for the latest blog posts.
Comments
It's easy for some bloggers to make Nuclear Energy look bad when they compare 40 year old reactors to Solar tech that might be available in 10 years. However, it's just crazy to say that current wind, solar, or biomass tech is better than current nuclear tech.
Also, what biomass plant is going to make hydrogen for a fuel cell? What's the environmental impact of manufacturing photo-voltaic panels for 1000's of homes?
Keep up the good work and keep fighting for intelligent energy solutions.