Skip to main content

Clean Sweep on Meet the Press

Here’s a bit of the discussion from this morning’s Meet the Press. Host David Gregory mostly focused on Libya, appropriately, with Sens. John Kerry (D-Mass.), Carl Levin (D-Mich.) and Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), then turned to Japan. (Transcript cleaned up a little to cover pauses and such.)

MR. GREGORY:  I want to turn to Japan, another crisis that the president is facing, and, of course, what the Japanese are dealing with. Here are some of the latest facts to emerge out of the disaster in Japan. The death toll now upwards of 8,100. Still so many missing, and the number of missing well over 12,000. Some signs of hope, though.  Incredible images coming out of Japan early today from Ishinomaki as there were incredible rescues of a teenager as well as an 80-year-old grandmother who was stuck inside of her house.  Thankfully, though, those two people were rescued.

But, Senator Levin, as the nuclear emergency continues in Japan there are real questions about the future of nuclear power in this country.  After Three Mile Island back in 1979, as a young senator you called for a moratorium of six months on any nuclear power plants in the United States. Should that hold true now?

SEN. LEVIN:  Well, I think there ought to be a period here where all of our nuclear plants are tested very, very carefully to make sure that they are safe, and to make sure that this cannot happen here.  But I don't think that we can say that we're not going to continue to use nuclear power. Europe depends heavily on it, and they have found it to be safe. We use it a lot. We have found it, since Three Mile Island, to be safe. And it seems to me that the great hope that we have, ultimately, in terms of greenhouse gas is to move away from fossil fuels. And although I think we have to be mighty careful about nuclear power, we should put a lot of effort into seeing what we can do with the waste, that we cannot give up on that possibility because of the climate change which is occurring from fossil fuels.

MR. GREGORY:  Senator Kerry, about 30 seconds here.  How big of a blow has nuclear power, as part of our energy mix, been dealt here?

SEN. KERRY:  Well, I think it's taken some hit, obviously.  But I think it's going to cause everybody to look for the fail-safe methodology and what the next generation of nuclear power might or might not be.  I think, you know, of equal urgency is simply responding to the demand of climate change and the need to move away from fossil fuels.  The faster we build an energy grid in America that we move to solar, thermal, other things, I think the marketplace will make that decision for us.

MR. GREGORY:  Senator Sessions, after the gulf oil spill, after the nuclear emergency in Japan, do you think the president is capable of leading a bipartisan effort to really make energy policy a priority, and to lead to some change?

SEN. SESSIONS:  He has to do that.  He has not done that.  The Energy Department seems to be putting out more roadblocks on American energy production than actually leading in the way to produce more energy.  We need more clean, American energy.  Now, that is a driving force for this country right now.  We're not seeing that leadership.  We've got gulf oil production blocked basically by not getting permits.  Only two have been made since the oil spill.

MR. GREGORY:  Right.

SEN. SESSIONS:  And we need to get moving.  We simply cannot afford not to.

MR. GREGORY:  I'm going to have to make that the last word.  Senators, thank you all very much.

---

That’s almost a clean sweep, but that “almost” is because Sen. Sessions was set on a different track. Here’s Sessions in The Birmingham News on Thursday:

I think we ought to check everything for safety," Shelby said. "If we have to build in some safety, let's do it."

Sessions said the Nuclear Regulatory Commission should learn from the Japanese experience and re-examine American plants. But he also doesn't want to stop work on building new nuclear plants.

"All I'm saying is we don't need to overreact because nuclear power has to be a part of the clean energy future," Sessions said.

Okay, now it’s a clean sweep.

Comments

DocForesight said…
Somebody needs to update Sens. Levin and Kerry that "Global Climate Disruption" has been replaced with reality -- mankind can (and does) pollute but it cannot influence the global climate system.

And why politicians from both sides of the aisle can't separate electricity and industrial process heat generation from transportation fuels and chemical feed stocks is baffling to me. Just doing that would make the argument easier to pose and defend.

Solar and wind will never, ever produce enough energy or power to support a modern society. Saying otherwise is an insult to our intelligence.

Popular posts from this blog

Making Clouds for a Living

Donell Banks works at Southern Nuclear’s Plant Vogtle units 3 and 4 as a shift supervisor in Operations, but is in the process of transitioning to his newly appointed role as the daily work controls manager. He has been in the nuclear energy industry for about 11 years.

I love what I do because I have the unique opportunity to help shape the direction and influence the culture for the future of nuclear power in the United States. Every single day presents a new challenge, but I wouldn't have it any other way. As a shift supervisor, I was primarily responsible for managing the development of procedures and programs to support operation of the first new nuclear units in the United States in more than 30 years. As the daily work controls manager, I will be responsible for oversight of the execution and scheduling of daily work to ensure organizational readiness to operate the new units.

I envision a nuclear energy industry that leverages the technology of today to improve efficiency…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear: Energy for All Political Seasons

The electoral college will soon confirm a surprise election result, Donald Trump. However, in the electricity world, there are fewer surprises – physics and economics will continue to apply, and Republicans and Democrats are going to find a lot to like about nuclear energy over the next four years.

In a Trump administration, the carbon conversation is going to be less prominent. But the nuclear value proposition is still there. We bring steady jobs to rural areas, including in the Rust Belt, which put Donald Trump in office. Nuclear plants keep the surrounding communities vibrant.

We hold down electricity costs for the whole economy. We provide energy diversity, reducing the risk of disruption. We are a critical part of America’s industrial infrastructure, and the importance of infrastructure is something that President-Elect Trump has stressed.

One of our infrastructure challenges is natural gas pipelines, which have gotten more congested as extremely low gas prices have pulled m…