The three videos below all appear on NEI’s dedicated YouTube page, the NEI Network. More videos will be offered in the coming days to provide perspectives on events in Japan. I’ll post them here as they appear and, if you cast your eyes rightward, you will see that we are tweeting them, too. But they will all be housed at YouTube. It’s worth a visit, as there are a lot of other interesting videos there on a range of nuclear energy topics. By all means, explore the offerings and see what you think.
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
Comments