Balancing Energy Needs and the Environment

Over at Complex Systems, Tyler Newton is thinking about the long term effects of Hurricane Katrina on U.S. energy policy:

The amount of investment in US energy infrastructure is set to explode, and the Republican-led government is about to help it happen. That means some combination of: drilling in Alaska, federal control over siting of LNG terminals, mining for oil shale in Colorado, more offshore drilling for natural gas outside the Gulf, unified rules for refinery grades, more refinery construction, more nuclear power plants, use of Yucca Mountain to store nuclear waste, a wave of utility mergers, rules to encourage distributed energy, investments in coal gasification plants, investments in mining the Alberta Tar Sands and, oh yeah, an increase in fuel efficiency standards.

The electorate fears the idea of gas shortages about as much as it does terrorism. While on average Americans are moderate environmentalists, they are not reactionary like environmental activists, and will not let parochial interests deny them they energy they need for a prosperous future.

Here's how our President and CEO, Skip Bowman, put it in a speech today to the World Nuclear Association Symposium in London:

I want to say a few words about unfinished business -- specifically, the work still ahead of us if we hope to fulfill President Eisenhower's vision (Atoms for Peace), and ensure that the world meets a growing appetite for electric power in a way that protects our environment.

We do not have to pick between the two. We can have more electricity to power future economic growth. We can have clean air. With nuclear energy, we can have both.

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog