Skip to main content

Balancing Energy Needs and the Environment

By Eric McErlain
Over at Complex Systems, Tyler Newton is thinking about the long term effects of Hurricane Katrina on U.S. energy policy:
The amount of investment in US energy infrastructure is set to explode, and the Republican-led government is about to help it happen. That means some combination of: drilling in Alaska, federal control over siting of LNG terminals, mining for oil shale in Colorado, more offshore drilling for natural gas outside the Gulf, unified rules for refinery grades, more refinery construction, more nuclear power plants, use of Yucca Mountain to store nuclear waste, a wave of utility mergers, rules to encourage distributed energy, investments in coal gasification plants, investments in mining the Alberta Tar Sands and, oh yeah, an increase in fuel efficiency standards.

The electorate fears the idea of gas shortages about as much as it does terrorism. While on average Americans are moderate environmentalists, they are not reactionary like environmental activists, and will not let parochial interests deny them they energy they need for a prosperous future.
Here's how our President and CEO, Skip Bowman, put it in a speech today to the World Nuclear Association Symposium in London:
I want to say a few words about unfinished business -- specifically, the work still ahead of us if we hope to fulfill President Eisenhower's vision (Atoms for Peace), and ensure that the world meets a growing appetite for electric power in a way that protects our environment.

We do not have to pick between the two. We can have more electricity to power future economic growth. We can have clean air. With nuclear energy, we can have both.
For more on how nuclear energy can contribute to environmental preservation, click here.

Technorati tags:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more