Skip to main content

LA Blackout Roundup

A little less than 24 hours after wide swaths of Los Angeles were left without power yesterday, a number of folks are asking pointed questions about the hows and whys of the blackout, which was apparently caused by worker error:
A mistake on a single bundle of wires Monday cascaded into a major blackout in and around Los Angeles, inconveniencing millions of people and renewing questions about the vulnerability of the region's power system...

The mistake rippled through the electrical grid, threatening to overload another transmission station and two electrical generating plants: the Scattergood generating station south of Los Angeles International Airport and the Haynes generating station near Long Beach.

The DWP shut down the generating facilities to avoid damage, sharply reducing the amount of power available to the city. That caused blackouts in neighborhoods across the city, with heavy concentrations in parts of the San Fernando Valley, South Los Angeles and the downtown area. All of Burbank's 52,000 customers and half of Glendale's 80,000 also lost power. Both cities' electrical systems are linked to the DWP.
With the power out, the job of explaining the outage fell to LADWP's Ron Deaton:
The veteran civil servant stood calmly in front of the DWP headquarters on Bunker Hill in downtown Los Angeles with a giant map of the power grid, trying to explain why it was actually good news that so much of the city was without power.

"The system was doing what it was supposed to do," Deaton told a television reporter, explaining that power was switched off to protect the system from being greatly damaged.

"It's better to shut it down than to burn out the whole system," he said.
Christopher Swope has some thoughts on Deaton's performance. Here's a map of how the outage cascaded throughout the area. When the power goes out, many of the modern conveniences we rely on, like broadband Internet access, fall to the wayside:
Another tool of modern life — high-speed Internet connections — was knocked out in some parts of the city because of the outage. Patti Rockenwegner, a spokesperson for Comcast, which provides cable and broadband Internet service to about 500,000 customers in Southern California, said some customers in Hollywood and South Los Angeles lost service for about 40 minutes when the outage tripped fuses.
As was reported elsewhere, Los Angeles-based Web hosting provider Dreamhost was knocked offline for several hours, taking a number of bloggers with it.

Here's a map of how the outage cascaded throughout the area.

With the power out, a number of LA-based refineries were forced to burn off petroleum products:
The controlled fires, or flares, were visible for miles and triggered air quality alerts in neighborhoods surrounding the refineries. They prompted a small number of emergency room visits from residents who complained of illnesses they said were caused by the fires. While commuters and residents of communities such as Wilmington are familiar with the spectacle, the burn-offs rarely occur in such numbers and at the same time...

Gasoline is produced under great pressure and heat. When refineries lose power, that pressure needs to be released. The petroleum product is sent up tall stacks, where it is burned off by the stack-top flares, causing flames and heavy smoke. The burn-off is a safety mechanism that prevents chemicals from spreading through the refinery, officials said.
The paper has set up a message board and asked LA residents to share their experiences -- some more interesting than others. For a more humorous take on the outage, check out Bridget Johnson.

Bill Quick is annoyed:
I can almost write this story in my sleep. It hasn't changed in a generation. Some piddling switch or transformer or relay blows a gasket, and ever-widening cascades of failure eventually destroy the power to thousands of square miles and millions of people.

The fact is, our national power grid is an antiquated mess. And much of our other infrastructure, from roads and rails to power, transport, and shipping systems, is a rickety joke. Yet what do we spend money on?
A good question. The fact is, America has been underspending on energy infrastructure for a long, long time.

For our roundup on the blackout from yesterday, click here. And before I forget, thanks to Cal Energy Blog for many of the pointers we used during the blackout.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...