Skip to main content

Entergy's Leonard on New Nuclear: "I want to be at the head of that line."

In an interview with New York Times reporter Barnaby Feder, Entergy's Wayne Leonard had this to say bout his company's future with nuclear energy:
Q. Let's talk about nuclear energy, the part of Entergy that has been obscured by the blow to its regulated power distribution companies. You're the second biggest operator of nuclear plants around the country. What Entergy's nuclear future?

A. A big portion of our earnings and growth is occurring with nuclear power plants in the Northeast and South that people questioned when we bought them. Every three or four months we are saving our customers half a billion dollars.

Our strategy has been acquiring plants that are already built and fixing them up. Two years ago, I said I'm not enthusiastic at all about being the first to build a new plant. My mind's changed on that. I want to be at the head of the line. More and more environmentalists are recognizing that the issues of global warming are real and they are saying as much as they hate to say it the only answer is nuclear. We're going to encourage people in the renewable niche and we'll probably by power from them but you've got to think about what you do best. In our case, it's nuclear. We have to be flawless in that.
For more on Entergy Nuclear, click here.

UPDATE: The bulk of Leonard's interview had to do with Entergy's response to Hurricane Katrina, something that was the subject of a conference call yesterday sponsored by the Association of Energy Services Professionals. My colleague Jarret Adams listened in on the call, and shared this report.
Summary of AESP Luncheon on Entergy Response to Hurricane Katrina

This conference call was led by Art Wiese, v.p., corp. comm., at Entergy and Jim Raleigh, director of support services. They detailed Entergy’s preparation for Hurricane Katrina and the response following the storm during a Sept. 14 conference call.

They noted at its highest level, some 1.1 million had lost power. As of Sept. 14, Entergy had restored power to 800,000 LA residents and all MS residents.

Raleigh said, “Preparation was key to the company’s response” He credited:
• Proven storm plan
• Knowledgeable, experienced work force
• Innovative storm tools, like Inside Entergy Stormnet (Extranet application)

The company evacuated 1,900 employees. They ordered the evacuation on Fri, Aug. 26, before the storm hit. Some went to Jackson, some to Baton Rouge and some went with crews, etc. They point to the fact they “spent a lot of time” communicating the emergency plan to employees and the general risk of hurricanes and flooding. There was not one death among Entergy employees.Wiese described the communications elements to the response:

Entergy employed communications vehicles, including: like Inside Entergy Stormnet, Inside Entergy (daily print/fax edition and on web), employee infoline

External comm.: www.entergy.com, commercials (print, radio, TV), press releases, media interviews, visits to the “front”, Entergyradio.com, The Power of Hope fund (ads)

Key external comm. strategies:
• Good restoration and good communication go hand in hand
• Whole company should speak with one voice
• Select key messages of the day and emphasize and re-emphasize them
• Reward for opening up to the media was greater than the risk
• Entergy asked for advice from other power companies: Duke, Progress, PPL
• Also had help from EEI, NEI

Key messages to employees (internal comm.):
• Everyone still has a job, benefits, paycheck, etc.
• Everyone will be provided living quarters if needed
• Everyone will be provided financial assistance if needed
• No employee will be put in harm’s way
• We will find all employees
• Established The Power of Hope Fund
An amazing performance that everyone at Entergy can be proud of. Bravo.

Technorati tags:

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin