Skip to main content

Build your own nuclear reactor!

By Kevin McCoy

Suppose you really want your own nuclear reactor, but the price is a bit steep, you don’t have enough space, and the NRC licensing requirements are just too much of a hassle. If that’s your problem, you can now build a 1:350 scale model of an EPR. The price is about $30, the finished model fits in an area 79 x 84 cm (31 x 33 inches), and no NRC license is required. The model kit contains printed sheets of heavy paper that you cut, fold, and glue to create the various components.

The complete model, with about 2900 parts, is astonishingly detailed, with reactor vessel, steam generators, piping, cranes, emergency diesel generators, even turbine rotors.

It is said to take 150 to 300 hours to construct. If that is too much work for you, you can use the same kit but build a simpler version in which some or all of the internal components are eliminated. The simplest version is an architectural model only, with about 220 parts. That version is said to require about 55 hours to complete. On the other hand, if you are really a serious model-builder, you won’t be satisfied with just one of these kits. You will want to build a three-unit plant!

The complete model would be an exceptional training tool. It would show spatial relationships within the plant far more vividly than drawings or even computer animations. It also might be a good gift for a high school student who is interested in nuclear engineering.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
I would much much prefer the real thing. I really wish i lived near one of the marvels, but we dont have any in Australia. Ah well...
December 2, 2005 at 8:09 PM
Anonymous said…
Speaking of "an execeptional training tool", Gee, do you think the Jihad or the Timothy McVeigh wanna-bes could use one of these for their very own table top exercise on how to take out a nuke?

Paul,NIRS
December 3, 2005 at 2:11 PM
Brian Mays said…
Frightening indeed! Just imagine what they might discover:

If you pour enough water on the containment building it gets soft and mushy!

The entire building is extremely inflammable!

Airplanes (also made of paper, of course) really don't cause much damage when they hit the plant. Oh well ... back to skyscrapers ...
December 5, 2005 at 6:58 AM
Kevin McCoy said…
That's an interesting idea, Paul, but I don't think it holds up. If I were a terrorist (I'm not) bent on attacking a nuclear power plant, locating a specific component to attack would probably be the least of my worries.

To put it slightly different terms, suppose you wanted to break into a bank at night and steal all the money from the vault. Sure, you would need to know where the vault was, but the real challenge would be how to get into it.
December 6, 2005 at 12:33 PM
Kevin McCoy said…
For more information on the EPR cardmodel, including an interesting discussion on the design of cardmodels and the recent history of cardmodeling, visit http://www.neimagazine.com/story.asp?sectionCode=76&storyCode=2025159
January 10, 2006 at 5:20 PM
Anonymous said…
i am a high school student in india ,i want to make a model of a nuclear power plant for science model copetetion at national level can you help me out if so please reply me on my user account that is push_pendharkar@yahoo.com
i will be thankfull to you sir
June 8, 2008 at 11:39 AM
Unknown said…
can some one just tell me where can i find the nuclear reactor if i want to buy the $30 one
plz contact me before 30th August
my email id is nasirmaniar@aol.in
August 19, 2008 at 3:01 AM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more