Skip to main content

On the Trail of the "Tooth Fairy"

By Eric McErlain
Tuesday's edition of the Brattleboro Reformer carried a story that Joseph Mangano, head of the Radiation and Public Health Project, better known as the "Tooth Fairy" project, has parachuted into Vermont with his shaky science in order to shake things up around Vermont Yankee.

For those who aren't familiar with his schtick, Mangano is determined to demonstrate a link between Strontium 90 (Sr-90), nuclear plants and childhood cancer by analyzing the levels of Sr-90 found in baby teeth.

What the Brattleboro reporter neglects to mention, is that Mangano has been taking his public health snake oil show on the road for some time now. And whenever real scientists debunk his research findings, Mangano just goes to another city or town hoping that nobody follows his trail.

Earlier this year when CNN did a feature on Mangano, we had this to say:
Consistently, the NRC has found no appreciable changes from background radiation near nuclear plants. In all, eight state departments of health have investigated Mangano's claims, and all eight states (Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Minnesota and Michigan) refused to validate them.
Just as damaging was this determination published by the New Jersey Commission on Radiation Protection in February 2004:
The Commission is of the opinion that "Radioactive Strontium-90 in Baby Teeth of New Jersey Children and the Link with Cancer: A Special Report," is a flawed report, with substantial errors in methodology and invalid statistics. As a result, any information gathered through this project would not stand up to the scrutiny of the scientific community. There is also no evidence to support the allegation that the State of New Jersey has a problem with the release of Sr-90 into the environment from nuclear generating plants: more than 30 years of environmental monitoring data refute this.
All this information is relatively easy to find, including our earlier entry on Mangano, which shows up in the first ten Goggle search results when you search on his name and "tooth fairy".

For me, this issue is a whole lot like the accusations that Helen Caldicott makes against the nuclear industry. And the response always has to be the same: To counter the hysteria with sound science whenever it gets repeated.

For more on the "Tooth Fairy" issue from the NEI archives, click here and here.

UPDATE: In other news, Entergy Nuclear, the owner of Vermont Yankee, has applied to NRC for renewal of the plant's license, as well as the license for the Pilgrim Nuclear Power Station.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Stewart Peterson said…
Well, the Tooth Fairy Project is a subset of RPHP, but I nitpick.

My September 30 Anti-Nuclear Quote of the Day covered it. An interesting comment from an anti-nuclear activist can be found near the end.
December 1, 2005 at 5:49 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

By
Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...
4 comments
Read more