Skip to main content

NEI Wall Street Briefing

This morning in New York, Tony Early, Chairman and CEO of DTE Energy as well as Chairman of NEI's Board of Directors and NEI CEO Skip Bowman delivered the industry's annual Wall Street Briefing (PDF). For those of you looking to develop a better understanding of the industry, the briefing is a good place to start. For the rest of us at NEI, it serves as an important information resource that we rely on throughout the year.

The presentation is broken into three parts: First, there's a discussion of industry performance metrics for 2005; second, a discussion on building new nuclear plants and the reasons for renewed interest in new nuclear build; and finally, a preview of the policy issues the industry will confront in 2006.

Congratulations to the team at NEI that put the briefing together: Richard Myers, Mary Quillian, Elizabeth King, Jim Slider and David Bradish. Great job.

POSTSCRIPT: The news release on the briefing can be found by clicking here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Jim Hopf said…
One slide in the briefing contains and error (which should be fixed if it is to be used again). It made reference to clean (IGCC) coal with sequestration (at a cost of $55/MWh, I believe). This cost, which was only slightly higher than that shown for conventional (dirty) coal, clearly corresponds to IGCC coal WITHOUT sequestration (of CO2).

As far as what coal with full squestration of CO2 would cost, the sky's the limit. I haven't been convinced (yet) that it is even practical, let alone remotely economical.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …