Skip to main content

Westinghouse Goes to Toshiba

An event that had been talked about for a few weeks finally came about today, as Toshiba announced that it had completed an agreement with British Nuclear Fuels to acquire Westinghouse. The final price tag: $5.4 billion (U.S.):
``Given the potential we believe what we've paid is the correct price, there was a lot of competition,'' Atsutoshi Nishida, Toshiba president, said today during a press conference in London. The acquisition will triple Toshiba's nuclear energy business, he said.

Toshiba is seeking to expand its power plant operations as the company expects the market for atomic energy to expand by 50 percent by 2020. Westinghouse will give Toshiba the pressurized water reactor technology preferred by China, which may spend as much as $54 billion by that year building nuclear stations.

The price paid for the business, up from $3.2 billion during an auction three weeks before Toshiba was chosen last month as the preferred bidder, is almost five times the $1.1 billion the U.K. government paid for Westinghouse in 1999. Toshiba trumped bids from companies including General Electric Co. and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries Ltd.
Toshiba also announced that it would be selling portions of Westinghouse to a number of minority investors, but that Toshiba would still retain control of at least 51 percent of Westinghouse.

For more from Toshiba, read their official press announcement.

Technorati tags: , , , , , AP-1000

Comments

Anonymous said…
It's sad, in a way, to see another of these former industrial giants in the US, icons of a former role as leader of the world in manufacturing, being sold out in the foreign marketplace. Westinghouse Electric Co. was an innovator in many ways, being involved in the early development of AC power distribution, manufacturer of generators and steam supply systems, appliances, and other consumer goods. Today it is a shadow of it's former self. The business paradigm currently in vogue in this country, which seems to be sell everything out to foreigners to increase short-term "profits", lacks a long-term vision. Selling out for a quick buck often leaves nothing behind to build on.
Matthew66 said…
US companies are not backward in coming forward when it comes to buying foreign firms, so one ought not to complain too loudly when a foreign company buys a former US company. Westinghouse has been foreign owned since 1999 when it was purchased from CBS by British Nuclear Fuels Limited, which is wholly owned by the British Government. At least now it is not owned by a foreign government. It is also likely that Toshiba will sell minority interests to US companies.

General Electric bid for Westinghouse, although I suspect that even if it had been the highest bidder, GE would have lost on the grounds that a merger would significantly reduce competition for the supply of new reactors to the US market.
Anonymous said…
I think ABB owned it before BNFL. But it's true that it is kind of distrurbing to see these former giants of US industry being sold out to foreigners. It took a lot of hard work to build what we have (had). It's unfortunate that things have come to pass that Americans would rather sell out than build up.
Anonymous said…
It is sad to see a company such as Westinghouse that had such great potential -- be sold to a foreign-owned company. The top Management at Westinghouse did not do their job. They should have performed better and made the company what it should be -- U.S. owned. It is clear, that poor Management is the demise of Westinghouse today in the year 2006.
Anonymous said…
It is sad to see a company such as Westinghouse that had such great potential -- be sold to a foreign-owned company. The top Management at Westinghouse did not do their job. They should have performed better and made the company what it should be -- U.S. owned. It is clear, that poor Management is the demise of Westinghouse today in the year 2006.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why Nuclear Plant Closures Are a Crisis for Small Town USA

Nuclear plants occupy an unusual spot in the towns where they operate: integral but so much in the background that they may seem almost invisible. But when they close, it can be like the earth shifting underfoot.

Lohud.com, the Gannett newspaper that covers the Lower Hudson Valley in New York, took a look around at the experience of towns where reactors have closed, because the Indian Point reactors in Buchanan are scheduled to be shut down under an agreement with Gov. Mario Cuomo.


From sea to shining sea, it was dismal. It wasn’t just the plant employees who were hurt. The losses of hundreds of jobs, tens of millions of dollars in payrolls and millions in property taxes depressed whole towns and surrounding areas. For example:

Vernon, Vermont, home to Vermont Yankee for more than 40 years, had to cut its municipal budget in half. The town closed its police department and let the county take over; the youth sports teams lost their volunteer coaches, and Vernon Elementary School lost th…