Skip to main content

California ISO Declares "Power Watch"

By Eric McErlain
Here's something to watch over the weekend -- high temps across Southern California stressing the electrical grid:
A "power watch" will also be in effect Thursday through Monday for much of the Southland due to high temperatures and increased power demands, the California Independent System Operator announced.

Residents are urged to conserve power, especially during peak afternoon hours.

To save energy, homeowners should set thermostats at 78 degrees and use fans, turn off appliances and power tools when not being used, block direct sunlight from overheating rooms, and close doors and vents in unoccupied rooms.

The heat is expected to peak across the region on Saturday, with high temperatures expected to top 100 degrees in most locations in the valleys and across lower elevations in the mountains.

Southern California Edison officials expect a record demand for power this weekend. The utility's record for peak demand of 45,431 megawatts was set July 20, 2005.
Click here to monitor the situation through the California ISO.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
I find it increasingly frustrating that nothing has been done to aleviate this ongoing problem. Billions of dollars are spent outside the country, yet something as basic as our nations power grid has been given no preference whatsoever. I cannot fathom why, in the 21st century, we are having random blackouts, people are dying from heat exhaustion and we are being asked to put our theremostats at 78 degrees, close our drapes, turn off all appliances and basically retreat to a cave when money has been, and still is, available for the construction of power stations, as well as alternate forms of power. This has been an ongoing problem for over 60 years and yet nothing has been done. Why have builders not been urged to put solar panels on newly constructed homes, I know of at least one builder who is now doing this, and dont tell me cost, they are making hefty profits from new home sales. Also why have we not looked more at hydrogen power? All you ever get told is expense, expense. Money for conflict seems to be abundant. Perhaps more effort should be put into what is happening here at home.
July 24, 2006 at 3:54 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

By
Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...
7 comments
Read more

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

By
You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...
6 comments
Read more