Skip to main content

Sierra Club's Nukes by the Number

Here’s a link to one of our favorite anti-nuclear groups, which just came out with some bullet points on Nukes by the Numbers.

Right off the bat they get the first number wrong.
104: Number of commercially operating nuclear power reactors in the United States.
It’s actually 103 commercially operating nuclear reactors. The 104th reactor (Browns Ferry 1) has been shutdown and is expected to come back on line in May 2007. It still holds an operating license; however, it hasn’t been operating since the 1980s. They even link to the source, and the source says:
There are currently 104 licensed to operate nuclear power plants in the United States (69 PWRs and 35 BWRs).
So far we’re 0 for 1. Let’s check out the third bullet:
$2,451,200,000: First-quarter 2006 gross operating profits of Entergy, Exelon, Duke Energy, and Southern Company.
This I find humorous. If you click on their Smart Energy Summer link on the top of their page it will take you here. Check out what the second paragraph says:
Despite once being promised that electricity from nuclear energy would be "too cheap to meter," it is the most expensive way anyone's ever discovered to boil water.
The top four nuclear investor-owned utilities made $2.5 billion in the first quarter of 2006 and yet the Web page says it’s the most expensive way to boil water. Obviously it’s not that expensive if companies are reporting million-dollar earnings each quarter.
300,000: Years that nuclear waste must be stored for it to be considered safe.
Probably not.
0: Number of approved or operating long-term nuclear waste storage facilities in the United States.
Actually, there’s one approved facility and that’s Yucca Mountain, which was approved back in 2002. That was big news. I wonder how Sierra Club missed it.
3 out of 3: Number of federal judges that agreed in 2003 that Yucca Mountain is not safe.
That’s if you believe Nevada’s one win out of the 12 rulings means Yucca Mountain is unsafe. Here’s what really happened:
July 9, 2004 - In a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today affirmed Congress’ 2002 endorsement of the planned Yucca Mountain, Nev., underground repository for used nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants and high-level radioactive waste from U.S. defense programs. Ruling in a group of consolidated cases, the appellate court rejected all but one of the legal challenges raised by the state of Nevada, including a constitutional challenge.
Public Citizen called this one win a victory.
20,000,000: Number of people within 50 miles of the Indian Point nuclear power plant near New York City, which one of the planes hijacked on September 11, 2001, flew directly over.
It’s also probably the number of people who rely on the irreplaceable plant to keep them cool and living healthy, especially in this summer heat wave.

Here are a few of my Nukes by the Numbers:

73: Nuclear’s percentage of U.S. carbon-free electricity (pdf).

One football field six yards deep: The cubic space of all the high-level nuclear waste from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.

53,000: The total number of people working at U.S. nuclear power plants.

$350 million: The total output to the local community from an average nuclear plant.

700 million metric tons: The amount of carbon dioxide emissions avoided each year by U.S. nuclear plants.

2 billion metric tons: The amount of carbon dioxide emissions avoided each year by all the nuclear plants in the world.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
I'd recommend against using the link to the German scientist who speculates that cooling nuclear waste will accelerate the decay rate. Even if it worked (no data available), there are obvious technical problems with that approach that would make it much more expensive than Yucca Mountain (and that's saying something!).

It would be better to point out that spent nuclear fuel decays to the same radioactivity level as uranium ore in about 8000 years, not 300,000.
David Bradish said…
You're exactly right. My reason on using the link was to just point out that there are so many ways being explored to deal with waste, 300,000 years is not reality. I believe in the next 100 years nuclear waste won't even be a problem with the advances of technology we are seeing.

Popular posts from this blog

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Why Ex-Im Bank Board Nominations Will Turn the Page on a Dysfunctional Chapter in Washington

In our present era of political discord, could Washington agree to support an agency that creates thousands of American jobs by enabling U.S. companies of all sizes to compete in foreign markets? What if that agency generated nearly billions of dollars more in revenue than the cost of its operations and returned that money – $7 billion over the past two decades – to U.S. taxpayers? In fact, that agency, the Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank), was reauthorized by a large majority of Congress in 2015. To be sure, the matter was not without controversy. A bipartisan House coalition resorted to a rarely-used parliamentary maneuver in order to force a vote. But when Congress voted, Ex-Im Bank won a supermajority in the House and a large majority in the Senate. For almost two years, however, Ex-Im Bank has been unable to function fully because a single Senate committee chairman prevented the confirmation of nominees to its Board of Directors. Without a quorum

NEI Praises Connecticut Action in Support of Nuclear Energy

Earlier this week, Connecticut Gov. Dannel P. Malloy signed SB-1501 into law, legislation that puts nuclear energy on an equal footing with other non-emitting sources of energy in the state’s electricity marketplace. “Gov. Malloy and the state legislature deserve praise for their decision to support Dominion’s Millstone Power Station and the 1,500 Connecticut residents who work there," said NEI President and CEO Maria Korsnick. "By opening the door to Millstone having equal access to auctions open to other non-emitting sources of electricity, the state will help preserve $1.5 billion in economic activity, grid resiliency and reliability, and clean air that all residents of the state can enjoy," Korsnick said. Millstone Power Station Korsnick continued, "Connecticut is the third state to re-balance its electricity marketplace, joining New York and Illinois, which took their own legislative paths to preserving nuclear power plants in 2016. Now attention should