Sierra Club's Nukes by the Number

Here’s a link to one of our favorite anti-nuclear groups, which just came out with some bullet points on Nukes by the Numbers.

Right off the bat they get the first number wrong.

104: Number of commercially operating nuclear power reactors in the United States.

It’s actually 103 commercially operating nuclear reactors. The 104th reactor (Browns Ferry 1) has been shutdown and is expected to come back on line in May 2007. It still holds an operating license; however, it hasn’t been operating since the 1980s. They even link to the source, and the source says:

There are currently 104 licensed to operate nuclear power plants in the United States (69 PWRs and 35 BWRs).

So far we’re 0 for 1. Let’s check out the third bullet:

$2,451,200,000: First-quarter 2006 gross operating profits of Entergy, Exelon, Duke Energy, and Southern Company.

This I find humorous. If you click on their Smart Energy Summer link on the top of their page it will take you here. Check out what the second paragraph says:

Despite once being promised that electricity from nuclear energy would be "too cheap to meter," it is the most expensive way anyone's ever discovered to boil water.

The top four nuclear investor-owned utilities made $2.5 billion in the first quarter of 2006 and yet the Web page says it’s the most expensive way to boil water. Obviously it’s not that expensive if companies are reporting million-dollar earnings each quarter.

300,000: Years that nuclear waste must be stored for it to be considered safe.

Probably not.

0: Number of approved or operating long-term nuclear waste storage facilities in the United States.

Actually, there’s one approved facility and that’s Yucca Mountain, which was approved back in 2002. That was big news. I wonder how Sierra Club missed it.

3 out of 3: Number of federal judges that agreed in 2003 that Yucca Mountain is not safe.

That’s if you believe Nevada’s one win out of the 12 rulings means Yucca Mountain is unsafe. Here’s what really happened:

July 9, 2004 - In a unanimous ruling, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit today affirmed Congress’ 2002 endorsement of the planned Yucca Mountain, Nev., underground repository for used nuclear fuel from nuclear power plants and high-level radioactive waste from U.S. defense programs. Ruling in a group of consolidated cases, the appellate court rejected all but one of the legal challenges raised by the state of Nevada, including a constitutional challenge.

Public Citizen called this one win a victory.

20,000,000: Number of people within 50 miles of the Indian Point nuclear power plant near New York City, which one of the planes hijacked on September 11, 2001, flew directly over.

It’s also probably the number of people who rely on the irreplaceable plant to keep them cool and living healthy, especially in this summer heat wave.

Here are a few of my Nukes by the Numbers:

73: Nuclear’s percentage of U.S. carbon-free electricity (pdf).

One football field six yards deep: The cubic space of all the high-level nuclear waste from U.S. commercial nuclear power plants.

53,000: The total number of people working at U.S. nuclear power plants.

$350 million: The total output to the local community from an average nuclear plant.

700 million metric tons: The amount of carbon dioxide emissions avoided each year by U.S. nuclear plants.

2 billion metric tons: The amount of carbon dioxide emissions avoided each year by all the nuclear plants in the world.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Environment, Energy, Technology, Economics

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog