Meet Roger Schlafly.
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
Comments
I don't buy the standard response that you don't endorse the material you link to--at best, it's a miscalculation, since a statement that there are a lot of pro-nuclear fringe right-wingers (really the only reasonable conclusion one can draw here) is not the message we need to convey nor the type of strength we should try to project. Nobody forces you to link to sites about "defending the American patriarchy" and other offensive material--if Osama bin Laden endorsed nuclear power, would you link to him?
Is that material offensive? Absolutely. Sexism is about a command economy, period. Capitalists and businesspeople everywhere need to oppose measures that rob the economy of 51% of its workforce by accident of birth--nothing could be more anti-capitalist.
I reserve the right to reprint this comment wherever and whenever I want.