Skip to main content

NEI Energy Markets Report, August 13-17, 2007

Here's a summary of what went on in the energy markets last week:
Generation outages, higher gas prices and hot temperatures contributed to the more than $15/MWh increase in electricity prices at the Palo Verde and SP15 hubs. PJM West and NEPOOL prices declined by more than $12/MWh and $30/MWh from the previous week after the recent heat wave receded in the region. Entergy and ERCOT modestly declined (see pages 1 and 3).

Gas prices at the Henry Hub increased $0.64 to $6.92/MMBtu (see pages 1 and 3). According to EIA, hot summer temperatures and tropical storm activity in the Atlantic last week resulted in further price increases. As of August 10, working gas in storage was 15 percent above the 5-year average inventory level.

UxConsulting’s uranium spot price fell to $90/lb U3O8 (see pages 1 and 3). UxC suggests that the continued decline in prices could be due to the seasonal nature of demand as well as strained existing budgets.

The estimated U.S. nuclear plant availability factor averaged 98% for the week. Browns Ferry 1 tripped due to a neutron monitoring trip signal. Due to warm river temperatures, Browns Ferry 2 was shut down to meet state limits on downriver water temperatures (see pages 2 and 4).

Crude oil prices fell for the first time since early June to $71.92/barrel as of 8/10/07. EIA speculates that the high oil prices in the beginning of the summer encouraged extra supply through increased imports and/or domestic production to drive prices down for the end of the summer (see pages 1 and 3).

For the week ending August 11, the Edison Electric Institute noted 96,955 GWh was the second highest output ever recorded. The week ending August 5, 2006 is the highest on record with an output of 98,583 GWh (see page 1).
For the report click here. It is also located on NEI's Financial Center webpage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…