Hurricane Katrina and Natural Gas Supply

Our friend Rod Adams takes note of how Hurricane Katrina is disrupting America's domestic natural gas supply at a particularly inopportune time:

This is supposed to be the beginning of the "storage" season when demand from air conditioning begins to fall and heating demand has not yet picked up. It is the time of year when the salt caverns that serve as storage facilities for methane are filled up so that there is adequate capacity to respond to those cold winter days. Because of the lowered demands in the electricity market, prices during this time of year are traditionally a bit lower, thus helping to keep the cost for gas in the winter lower than it would have been.

This cycle is being disrupted. Not only are prices high, but there is limited production and transportation available for the gas that would be stored. It might become a very cold and expensive winter for some people, a prospect that seems almost hard to contemplate right now.

All too true. Since 1992, America has built an abundance of natural gas-fired electric capacity, and that's put tremendous pressure on natural gas markets. The disruption of supply from Hurricane Katrina is sure to hurt this Winter.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy Hurricane Katrina Natural Gas Environment Energy Politics Technology Economics

Comments

Kevin McCoy said…

Supply disruptions are always a problem, but Rod's comments remind me of one of the strengths of nuclear: There is a large inventory of fuel in the core. Most U.S. plants operate on 18-month refueling cycles, so a disruption in fuel supply, even for a month, will usually not cause the plant to go down.

September 2, 2005 at 12:22 PM

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog