Robert Zubrin says yes.
Monday, January 28, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Blog List
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Nuclear News Roundup for 01/25/154 days ago
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Google and Renewable Energy:6 days ago
-
-
-
-
Cumbria Nuclear News & Views - NMP Out!1 week ago
-
-
Nuclear Energy Blog Carnival 2423 weeks ago
-
-
10 Cool Things about Nuclear waste6 months ago
-
-
NNN Archive
NNN Blogroll
- 4 Factor Consulting
- ANS Nuclear Cafe
- AREVA Next Energy Blog
- Atomic Insights
- Atomic Power Review
- Brave New Climate
- C2ES Climate Compass
- Canadian Energy Issues
- Clean Energy America
- Clean Energy Insight
- David Walters at DailyKos
- Deregulate the Atom
- Duke Energy Nuclear Information Center
- Energy Outlook
- Energy from Thorium
- Fuel Cycle Week
- James Conca
- Michele Kearney
- Musing Environment
- NGNP Alliance Blog
- NNadir Diary at DailyKos
- Neutron Bytes
- New Papyrus
- Next Big Future
- NuExec Consulting
- Nuclear Green
- Nuclear Grrl
- Nuclear Power? Yes Please
- Nuclear Street
- Nuke Power Talk
- Pop Atomic
- Talk Nuclear (Canadian Nuclear Association)
- The Neutron Economy
- This Week in Nuclear
- ThoriumMSR
- Yes Vermont Yankee
Contributors
Disclaimer
2 comments:
Bob Zubrin is a clever guy. If we do a crewed Mars mission in our lifetime, it will probably be based on his ideas - which include using a nuclear reactor to synthesize fuel for the return mission out of the Martian atmosphere.
That said, I think he's probably barking up the wrong tree here.
Aside from the dubious economics, there's several technical issues which makes this alternative less likely.
If you're going to make liquid fuels from coal for OPEC-busting, the process of making diesel from coal is not very different to making methanol, and there are already car and truck engines in mass production using the stuff.
As an extra bonus, diesel engines are much more efficient than spark-ignition engines because of the much higher compression ratio.
In any case, this doesn't solve the problem of carbon dioxide emissions from combustion, which are highly likely to be the subject of regulation soon.
For what it's worth, my best guess is that plug-in hybrids with increasingly long all-electric ranges, hopefully powered by nuclear electricity, will become increasingly commonplace through the 2010s.
Actually, the flex-fuel cars use E85, which is nominally 15% gasoline (for cold start) and 85% Ethanol. But it does not matter, you can make also Ethanol or Butanol from coal, or CO2 as feedstock.
With dedicated Ethanol/Methanol engines the achievable efficiency is actually HIGHER than the efficiency of diesels.
With a high temperature reactor as process heat source the "mine to wheel" efficiency would be higher than either hydrogen fuel cell or battery electric. And it is doable with the existing liquid fuel infrastructure and without much retooling the existing car fleet.
Also gets away from the rising commodity prices for battery or fuel-cell materials.
- Klaus
Post a Comment