Skip to main content

Looking Back at ABC News and "Loose Nukes" with Dr. Andrew Karam (Part III)

Here at NEI, one aspect of last night's story that we found particularly egregious was the multiple references to the possibility that highly enriched uranium might be stolen for use in a bomb. But what ABC News didn't provide were the details of exactly what would be involved in an operation to do just that. But Dr. Karam did:
To me, a more serious concern would be the theft of highly-enriched reactor fuel for use in making nuclear weapons, as suggested a few times. Let's face it - if a terrorist is going to steal the fuel and dissolve it to remove the fission products to make a dirty bomb, they may as well also remove the uranium to make a nuclear weapon! But let's think about this a little. The fuel elements are at the bottom of a 15-20 foot swimming pool. To remove them, terrorists would have to have scuba gear (or very good lungs), a crane or other lifting gear, and a way to move the fuel elements from the reactor building into their truck. All possible, but time-consuming.

They would need to disassemble the reactor core, unless they were going to lift it out whole - either will take time because of the size and awkwardness of the task. The bottom line is that nobody is going to break in at night and steal a reactor core overnight. A long weekend might suffice, but would require being undetected. Certainly it can be done, but would be difficult to pull off, and impossible to do so undected. And, once obtained, terrorists would have to find a way to hide out long enough to dissolve the fuel, remove the uranium, purify the uranium oxide into uranium metal, and machine the metal into bombs.

The other thing is that, once the fuel were stolen, the terrorists would have to do this work under tremendous time constraints because the entire national law enforcement and military establishments would be looking for them with some fairly sophisticated equipment. Making a gun-type nuclear device is not difficult, but it would take time to let the fuel "cool", and to do everything I mentioned above. Not impossible, but not a simple matter, and plenty of room to get caught.
Again, no simple feat. But after watching the ABC report, you'd get the impression that it was as easy as shoplifting a Snickers from a candy store.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …