AAEA Supporting Clinton ESP

The fight for the Clinton ESP is going hot and heavy, and our friend Norris McDonald of the African-American Environmentalists Association is in the thick of the fight:

In 2005, Norris McDonald, president of the African American Environmentalists Association, drove from Virginia to Clinton to support nuclear power at a meeting about the environmental impact statement included in the permit.

"Clinton stands at the crest of our energy future. This situation here is incredibly important. We would drive here, and I brought my son, we would come back again and drive 13 hours, this is just how important Clinton is," he said at the meeting, according to a transcript.

Global warming is the biggest threat to the country today, McDonald said in an interview, and by attending meetings such as the one in Clinton, he can bring a much-needed attention to an effective power source that is mostly carbon free.

For our archive of posts on the Clinton ESP application, click here.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics, Clinton ESP, Illinois, Exelon

Comments

Anonymous said…

Is this group funded by the nuclear industry?

December 8, 2006 at 11:21 AM

Norris McDonald said…

AAEA is not funded by the nuclear industry although we would welcome a multimillion dollar grant from the nuclear industry to make us comopetitive with their multimillion dollar environmental community adversaries.

And if the $6 billion per year environmental movement thinks our position is for sale, why don't they make us an offer?

December 8, 2006 at 10:48 PM

Anonymous said…

Thanks for the clarification Norris. Though I have to laugh at the assertion that the nuclear industry is outfunded by environmentalists. AREVA, GE, Westinghouse, Toshiba...all those poor little mom-and-pop operations, struggling just to get by.

December 11, 2006 at 11:35 AM

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog