Skip to main content

Anti-Nuke Alert: Alec Baldwin to Lead Charge Against Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant

What Lisa warned us about last week is about to come to pass: New York-born actor Alec Baldwin will be in New Jersey tonight to moderate a symposium/rally against the Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant.

There's plenty more I could write about this morning, but I think I just ought to mention this: Like me, Baldwin is a native of Long Island. And as folks in the nuclear energy industry know, it was back in the 1980s that activists there that helped scuttle a perfectly good nuclear power plant -- Shoreham -- that was just about ready to accept fuel.

What was the result? How about some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, ones that squeeze the pocket books of working class families. I guess Baldwin is trying to bring that same sort of sensibility to New Jersey.

Here are some other interesting facts about nuclear energy in New Jersey -- a state that gets more than 50% of its electricity from nuclear energy -- from an NEI fact sheet:
Twenty-one of twenty-three counties in New Jersey are in non-attainment for EPA'’s new 8-hour ozone standard. Ozone contributes to smog, which can lead to asthma attacks and respiratory impairment in young children and the elderly.
The Hope Creek, Oyster Creek and Salem plants supply emission-free power to New Jersey homes and businesses, while helping to improve the air quality.


Generating electricity with nuclear energy prevents the emission of pollutants like sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) and greenhouse gases like CO2 associated with burning fossil fuels. New Jersey's nuclear power plants avoided the emission of 230,000 tons of SO2, 45,600 tons of NOx and 27.3 million metric tons of CO2 in the year 2005.(Source: NEI/EPA) Emissions of SO2 lead to the formation of acid rain. NOx is a key precursor of both ground level ozone and smog. Greenhouse gases, like CO2, contribute to global warming. For perspective, the 45,600 tons of NOx avoided by nuclear power plants in New Jersey is the amount of NOx released in a year by 2.4 million passenger cars. There are 4.0 million cars registered in the state of New Jersey.
Local NA-YGN members are planning to attend the event and hand out material like this telling the other side of the story. If you want to support the effort, send an email to

For the rest of our archive on Oyster Creek, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,


Kirk Sorensen said…
I thought Alec Baldwin was moving to France and giving up on the US if Bush was elected? Did Alec reneg on his campaign promise?
Anonymous said…
Just as a sample, one of the actions the gathering wishes to call for is:

Write to federal representatives demanding that Exelon prove the plant is currently safe to an independent panel of experts and demand that Exelon and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission minimize the risk of terrorist action at the plant.

So the fact that the NRC is continually monitoring and reporting on the plant safety and security is not good enough. The fact that there is no effective action a terrorist can take at a plant to endanger the public is not relevant.

Good luck to the NA-YGN. Their efforts are sorely needed.

Popular posts from this blog

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.

Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…