Skip to main content

Anti-Nuke Alert: Alec Baldwin to Lead Charge Against Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant

What Lisa warned us about last week is about to come to pass: New York-born actor Alec Baldwin will be in New Jersey tonight to moderate a symposium/rally against the Oyster Creek Nuclear Power Plant.

There's plenty more I could write about this morning, but I think I just ought to mention this: Like me, Baldwin is a native of Long Island. And as folks in the nuclear energy industry know, it was back in the 1980s that activists there that helped scuttle a perfectly good nuclear power plant -- Shoreham -- that was just about ready to accept fuel.

What was the result? How about some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, ones that squeeze the pocket books of working class families. I guess Baldwin is trying to bring that same sort of sensibility to New Jersey.

Here are some other interesting facts about nuclear energy in New Jersey -- a state that gets more than 50% of its electricity from nuclear energy -- from an NEI fact sheet:
Twenty-one of twenty-three counties in New Jersey are in non-attainment for EPA'’s new 8-hour ozone standard. Ozone contributes to smog, which can lead to asthma attacks and respiratory impairment in young children and the elderly.
The Hope Creek, Oyster Creek and Salem plants supply emission-free power to New Jersey homes and businesses, while helping to improve the air quality.

[...]

Generating electricity with nuclear energy prevents the emission of pollutants like sulfur dioxide (SO2) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) and greenhouse gases like CO2 associated with burning fossil fuels. New Jersey's nuclear power plants avoided the emission of 230,000 tons of SO2, 45,600 tons of NOx and 27.3 million metric tons of CO2 in the year 2005.(Source: NEI/EPA) Emissions of SO2 lead to the formation of acid rain. NOx is a key precursor of both ground level ozone and smog. Greenhouse gases, like CO2, contribute to global warming. For perspective, the 45,600 tons of NOx avoided by nuclear power plants in New Jersey is the amount of NOx released in a year by 2.4 million passenger cars. There are 4.0 million cars registered in the state of New Jersey.
Local NA-YGN members are planning to attend the event and hand out material like this telling the other side of the story. If you want to support the effort, send an email to supportOysterCreek-at-hotmail.com.

For the rest of our archive on Oyster Creek, click here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Kirk Sorensen said…
I thought Alec Baldwin was moving to France and giving up on the US if Bush was elected? Did Alec reneg on his campaign promise?
Anonymous said…
Just as a sample, one of the actions the gathering wishes to call for is:

Write to federal representatives demanding that Exelon prove the plant is currently safe to an independent panel of experts and demand that Exelon and the Nuclear Regulatory Commission minimize the risk of terrorist action at the plant.

So the fact that the NRC is continually monitoring and reporting on the plant safety and security is not good enough. The fact that there is no effective action a terrorist can take at a plant to endanger the public is not relevant.

Good luck to the NA-YGN. Their efforts are sorely needed.

Popular posts from this blog

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…