Skip to main content

Progress Energy Florida Names Potential Nuclear Plant Site in Levy County

Progress Energy just issued a news release naming a potential nuclear power plant site in southern Levy County in Florida:


The Levy County site, approximately 3,000 acres (see map), is located about seven miles inland from the Gulf of Mexico and eight miles north of the company's Crystal River Energy Complex in Citrus County, where Progress Energy operates a nuclear plant, as well as four coal-fueled units. The Levy County location was chosen based on an assessment of the major siting criteria: land, access to sufficient quantities of water (from the Gulf) and access to the electric transmission system, as well as an overall evaluation of environmental considerations. The proximity of the site to the company's existing nuclear plant also would provide opportunities for efficiencies in shared support functions. In the coming months, the potential site will undergo further detailed assessment.

"Our commitment is to provide reliable and affordable energy to more than 1.6 million customers every day," said Jeff Lyash, president and CEO of Progress Energy Florida. "We expect demand for electricity in our service territory to grow by more than 25 percent in the next decade, and today's announcement is part of our long-term, balanced approach to meeting our customers' future needs.

"The site selection is not a decision to build a nuclear plant. That decision won't be made for a year or longer. But it is a critical step in ensuring that nuclear power remains open and viable for future years. That flexibility is important to consumers throughout the region, because it translates to having the right resources at the right time, and that promotes continued electric system reliability and stable prices. If and when we build a new nuclear plant, it will be with our continued rock-solid commitment to safety and security and will incorporate state-of-the-art technology."

I'd say the company is living up to its name...Stay tuned!

UPDATE: Here's what NEI Chief Nuclear Officer Marvin Fertel had to say about this development:

Progress Energy Florida is taking an important step forward today to meet Florida’s future electricity needs by selecting a site and making preparations to file a license application for a new nuclear plant. By doing so, the company has laid the groundwork to make a decision at the appropriate time to meet the future power needs of its customers.

With Florida’s population expected to increase by nearly 30 percent and the state’s electricity demand expected to grow 76 percent by 2030, new, large-scale power plants must be built to help meet this demand. An advanced design nuclear plant would provide Florida with a reliable and affordable supply of electricity without producing any greenhouse gases or air pollutants.
Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
your telling me and all the other families that live in the surrounding area that a nuclear power plant will not effect the enviroment, our health, our property value, all I have to say about that is I was born at night but not last night, and don't think because the people that live around here are all stupid. So blow it up some other comunities butt cuz we aint buyin it.

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...