Skip to main content

Canadian Minister: Nuclear to Play Role in Alberta Oil Sands

From The Calgary Sun:
Nuclear power in the oilpatch is just a matter of time, according to Canada's Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn.

Speaking to Sun Media from Victoria yesterday, Lunn said he's very keen to see a new partnership between Crown corporation Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and a private Alberta company to build a Candu-reactor to power oilsands extraction.

"It's not a question of if, it's a question of when in my mind," said Lunn. "I think nuclear can play a very significant role in the oilsands. I'm very, very keen."

Having toured nuclear plants such as Bruce Power's station on the shore of Lake Huron, Lunn said he believes nuclear power can help replace natural gas and other fossil fuels currently being burned to help extract bitumen from the oilsands.

"On this specific file, I've had discussions this week," said Lunn, declining to give more detail. "It's absolutely emission free. It's CO2 free."
As we saw in November, this idea seems to be getting bipartisan support inside Canada.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

David Wozney said…
"'On this specific file, I've had discussions this week,' said Lunn, declining to give more detail. 'It's absolutely emission free. It's CO2 free.'"

Nuclear plants emit radioactive tritium. The claim has been made that tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years. Yet more than thirty years after most of Hanford's nuclear reactors were shut down, tritium concentrations were measured in groundwater to be as high as 8 million picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for tritium is set at a maximum of 20,000 picocuries per liter for drinking water.
>>The claim has been made that tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years.

You're going to tell us that half-lives magically change, or that there's some vast conspiracy to lie about half-lives?
1. Do you know what a picocurie is?
2. What groundwater are you talking about (i.e., why quote the standard for drinking water in a discussion of non-drinking-water)?
3. You have given us the highest number you could find; what about the spectrum of results?
4. Are you aware that Hanford's reactors were not nuclear power plants?
5. Are you aware that the tritium is in the form of tritiated water, which is 60 times less radioactive than orange juice?
6. What does this all have to do with half-life, since you didn't tell us when your measurement was made or any other measurements of the same tritiated water and when they were made?

>>Every individual has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of New Testament Christian law.

I see. So you probably would be open to Jan Peczkis' argument about half-life.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …