Skip to main content

Canadian Minister: Nuclear to Play Role in Alberta Oil Sands

From The Calgary Sun:
Nuclear power in the oilpatch is just a matter of time, according to Canada's Natural Resources Minister Gary Lunn.

Speaking to Sun Media from Victoria yesterday, Lunn said he's very keen to see a new partnership between Crown corporation Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) and a private Alberta company to build a Candu-reactor to power oilsands extraction.

"It's not a question of if, it's a question of when in my mind," said Lunn. "I think nuclear can play a very significant role in the oilsands. I'm very, very keen."

Having toured nuclear plants such as Bruce Power's station on the shore of Lake Huron, Lunn said he believes nuclear power can help replace natural gas and other fossil fuels currently being burned to help extract bitumen from the oilsands.

"On this specific file, I've had discussions this week," said Lunn, declining to give more detail. "It's absolutely emission free. It's CO2 free."
As we saw in November, this idea seems to be getting bipartisan support inside Canada.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

David Wozney said…
"'On this specific file, I've had discussions this week,' said Lunn, declining to give more detail. 'It's absolutely emission free. It's CO2 free.'"

Nuclear plants emit radioactive tritium. The claim has been made that tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years. Yet more than thirty years after most of Hanford's nuclear reactors were shut down, tritium concentrations were measured in groundwater to be as high as 8 million picocuries per liter (pCi/L). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for tritium is set at a maximum of 20,000 picocuries per liter for drinking water.
>>The claim has been made that tritium has a half-life of 12.3 years.

You're going to tell us that half-lives magically change, or that there's some vast conspiracy to lie about half-lives?
1. Do you know what a picocurie is?
2. What groundwater are you talking about (i.e., why quote the standard for drinking water in a discussion of non-drinking-water)?
3. You have given us the highest number you could find; what about the spectrum of results?
4. Are you aware that Hanford's reactors were not nuclear power plants?
5. Are you aware that the tritium is in the form of tritiated water, which is 60 times less radioactive than orange juice?
6. What does this all have to do with half-life, since you didn't tell us when your measurement was made or any other measurements of the same tritiated water and when they were made?

>>Every individual has the right to the equal protection and equal benefit of New Testament Christian law.

I see. So you probably would be open to Jan Peczkis' argument about half-life.

Popular posts from this blog

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.


Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?