Natural Gas Crunch Could Shut Down Boston

From today's Boston Globe:

In March , ISO-New England CEO Gordon van Welie made headlines by putting coal and nuclear options on the table. Given New England's environmental attitudes, it is hard to believe that investors could be persuaded to risk their money developing either of these options.

[...]

The one thing states can't do is nothing. At a conference this year, van Welie told state utility regulators that if the Everett LNG facility lost its gas supply for a week during a January cold snap, the electric and gas grids in the City of Boston would fail.

I wonder how many more warnings the folks in New England need before disaster strikes?

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Environment, Energy, Politics, Technology, Economics, New England

Comments

Anonymous said…

The article also puts focus on the dangers of deregulation, something I agree with.

Deregulation leads to a lack of long term planning, to higher power prices (=higher corporate profits) and in the long run higher power generation costs (as risks, and hence discount rates, become higher). Deregulation also gives a structural boost to low capital cost generation, such as natural gas plants.

Those things are still being planned and built in spite of North American gas extraction having peaked and gone into decline.

Fiddling while Rome burns, indeed.

On the other hand, as I have recently become an Exelon shareholder I am all for deregulation. Just not in my backyard.

Hehehe.

December 8, 2006 at 4:00 PM

Fat Man said…

New Englanders turn up their noses at wind, and they are too far north for solar or bio-mass. So where do they think their energy is going to come from? The Tooth-fairy?

Back in the seventies, Texans had bumper stickers that said things like:

Let them freeze in the dark

and

Out of gas? Out of work?
Burn a Yankee

December 9, 2006 at 12:03 AM

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog