Skip to main content

House Panel Backs Mandatory Emissions Cap

From Greenwire (subscription required):
The influential House Appropriations Committee went on record this afternoon in support of addressing global warming through a mandatory cap on U.S. emissions. The Republican-led panel accepted a nonbinding climate change amendment that endorses capping greenhouse gas emissions as long as the program does not harm the U.S. economy. The amendment also requires participation from international trading partners.
More later...

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Starvid, Sweden said…
Whatever you do, don't implement an emissions trading system like we have in the EU. It only creates more volatility in power prices. If you do, make sure pollution rights are auctioned, not handed out.

Anyway, a federal CO2 tax is a lot smarter than emission trading. Less bureacracy and less volatility. And it makes it possible to tax gasoline too.

The money should go directly to the elimination of payroll taxes, so that the government does not become needlessly big, and also to compensate the poor for Buschco's unjust tax breaks for the rich.

------------------------------------

Or you could go absolutely French, volontariste, dirigiste, statist and use the money for 300 new state owned nuclear reactors, a continent spanning power grid and a massive TGV railroad system. :) :) :)
Paul Primavera said…
Starvid,

The issue of the tax cuts supported by President Bush is not all black and white. An interesting discussion on this was broadcast on the Diane Rehm Show on National Public Radio earlier today:

< http://www.wamu.org/programs/dr/ >

The Cato Institute has some really good studies of taxation in the US:

Tax Policy
< http://www.cato.org/fiscal/tax-policy.html >

Corporate Welfare
< http://www.cato.org/fiscal/corporate-welfare.html >

Federal Budget Policy
< http://www.cato.org/fiscal/budget-policy.html >

I think, however, that we can agree that the "borrow and spend" policy of the neo-conservatives is as injurious (if not more so) to long term American economic health as the the "tax and spend" policies of the liberal democrats.

If we borrow much more, then there will be nothing left for "300 new state owned nuclear reactors, a continent spanning power grid and a massive TGV railroad system"

:( :( :(

Seriously, though, at least in the US, private industry generally runs nukes a lot better than the govt. I used to work at a nuke owned and operated by NYPA, the state power organization for New York State. Then the plant got bought by Entergy. As a corporation, Entergy (ETR) is able to run a nuke a lot better than NYPA was (our capacity factor is a heck of a lot better under ETR than NYPA) - I have lived through it [and I still remain mgt's biggest critic - a happy sailor is a whining sailor!].

Lastly, what I have found amusing in a perverse sort of way is that if we had spend on new nukes what we have already spent in Iraq, then we would now be well on our way to energy independence and could thus let the Islamic fascists drown in their own oil.

Popular posts from this blog

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.


Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…