Skip to main content

President Bush to Visit Limerick Nuclear Generating Station

He'll be at the plant tomorrow to give a speech on energy policy. Stop by here tomorrow for details.

Technorati tags: , , , , , ,


gunter said…
Speaking of limericks, I couldn't resist:

There once was a president named Bush
Who hurried to war in a rush
His latest decision
Is safe nuclear fission
He’s talking right out of his tush!

There once was a fool who said oil
Has definitely gone off of the boil
We must rather go "newkular"
For a safe and clean future
And poison the air, water and soil.

There once was a moron from Maine
Who made a preposterous claim,
He said nuclear fission
Was his number one mission
To keep us safe, healthy and sane.
Ken said…
While I recognize that it is bad form to discuss other forum participants directly, I've noticed that gunter has recently given up any pretense of actually discussing the topics and has taken on the personna of a Troll. Most recent posts have been either political (Bush bashing), incorrect (abandoned reactors in Vietnam) or completely off topic. There are plenty of other places on the web for that stuff.
Paul Primavera said…
Well said, Ken.

One could easily make up as many nasty limericks about RFK Jr.'s current opposition to nuclear power (e.g., Entergy's IPEC facility) and his drug addiction two decades before (which is immaterial):

<,_Jr. >

Or how his cousin Rep. Patrick Kennedy recently crashed a car in Washington, DC at around 2 am in the morning while under the influence of prescription medication and is now re-entering rehab.

< >

Ad hominem attacks are easy, and both left and right wingers lose.

The point is that the right wing has supported big oil and big coal, and the left has opposed nuclear power, and BOTH are therefore to blame for the war in Iraq.

Mr. Gunter forgets that when he points one finger at someone else, three of his own point back at himself.

"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

And one last thing:

VOTE LIBERTARIAN and kick the right wing oil / coal oligopolists and left wing eco-nuts out!

< >
Brian Mays said…
I'm just glad that gunter didn't mention anybody from Nantucket.
Anonymous said…
Well, since Gunter started it, I guess two can play that game...

There was a goofball named Gunter,
Who was simply a one-note wonder.
He hates everything nuke,
Which proves he's a kook.
In this we can't be any blunter!

Gunter says nukes are bad.
But in their place he has nothing to add.
Wind and solar miss the mark.
Gunter freezes in the dark.
But perhaps that isn't so bad!!

So let's raise a dirge for old Paul,
He really hasn't a clue at all.
Nukes will clean up the air,
For the environment we'll care.
With clean energy at low cost for all!!!

(See, others can use exclamation points too.)
Eric McErlain said…
A helpful note from the Editor: Please keep your comments germane to the topic we're discussing. We've been fairly lenient here when it comes to standards, so please act responsibly and police yourselves.

Popular posts from this blog

Sneak Peek

There's an invisible force powering and propelling our way of life.
It's all around us. You can't feel it. Smell it. Or taste it.
But it's there all the same. And if you look close enough, you can see all the amazing and wondrous things it does.
It not only powers our cities and towns.
And all the high-tech things we love.
It gives us the power to invent.
To explore.
To discover.
To create advanced technologies.
This invisible force creates jobs out of thin air.
It adds billions to our economy.
It's on even when we're not.
And stays on no matter what Mother Nature throws at it.
This invisible force takes us to the outer reaches of outer space.
And to the very depths of our oceans.
It brings us together. And it makes us better.
And most importantly, it has the power to do all this in our lifetime while barely leaving a trace.
Some people might say it's kind of unbelievable.
They wonder, what is this new power that does all these extraordinary things?

A Design Team Pictures the Future of Nuclear Energy

For more than 100 years, the shape and location of human settlements has been defined in large part by energy and water. Cities grew up near natural resources like hydropower, and near water for agricultural, industrial and household use.

So what would the world look like with a new generation of small nuclear reactors that could provide abundant, clean energy for electricity, water pumping and desalination and industrial processes?

Hard to say with precision, but Third Way, the non-partisan think tank, asked the design team at the Washington, D.C. office of Gensler & Associates, an architecture and interior design firm that specializes in sustainable projects like a complex that houses the NFL’s Dallas Cowboys. The talented designers saw a blooming desert and a cozy arctic village, an old urban mill re-purposed as an energy producer, a data center that integrates solar panels on its sprawling flat roofs, a naval base and a humming transit hub.

In the converted mill, high temperat…

Seeing the Light on Nuclear Energy

If you think that there is plenty of electricity, that the air is clean enough and that nuclear power is a just one among many options for meeting human needs, then you are probably over-focused on the United States or Western Europe. Even then, you’d be wrong.

That’s the idea at the heart of a new book, “Seeing the Light: The Case for Nuclear Power in the 21st Century,” by Scott L. Montgomery, a geoscientist and energy expert, and Thomas Graham Jr., a retired ambassador and arms control expert.

Billions of people live in energy poverty, they write, and even those who don’t, those who live in places where there is always an electric outlet or a light switch handy, we need to unmake the last 200 years of energy history, and move to non-carbon sources. Energy is integral to our lives but the authors cite a World Health Organization estimate that more than 6.5 million people die each year from air pollution.  In addition, they say, the global climate is heading for ruinous instability. E…