Skip to main content

Meet The Press on Energy Policy

This morning at NEI, a lot of us are talking about yesterday's edition of Meet The Press that dealt with energy policy. Click here to view the program. Click here for the transcript.

Some thoughts, later.

UPDATE: Our friend Pat Cleary weighs in. And Tim Russert isn't doing too well either. Click here to see what I'm talking about. More here.

ANOTHER UPDATE: More head shaking here.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Comments

David Bradish said…
I thought it was great. Get Durbin out of there though. All the experts basically said the profits of oil companies are justified and Durbin's the one who just doesn't get it.

I couldn't believe the Senator from Illinois was so skeptical about nuclear of all the places.
Farkas said…
MTP showed its arrogance toward America by putting on Durbin and the inarticulate Bowman. What an opportunity lost to explain how the gasoline market works. Bowman did not seem to have much on his 3x5" card except some repeated nonsense about investigating the oil companies. It is unbelievable that Russert got him to declare a "crisis" in America.

Where I live, folks are happily sitting in long traffic jams on the way to work in Hartford coming south on I-91 as well as all the ones caught on the Belt Parkway around Kennedy airport this past weekend. $3 plus per gallon does not seem to be chaning behavior. No recession. In fact, the economy is booming along with 4.8% growth at last measure. Less than 5% unemployment, near historically low home mortgage interest rates, and a six year high in the DJIA, and a whole host of folks breaking down the boarder trying to get in on the action. MTP was another edition in the MSM's attempt to peddle doom & gloom.

Popular posts from this blog

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…