Here's a recent announcement over at Potential Energy that cheered me:
UPDATE: Here's a post where we need some of our supporters to take a stand -- a discussion about decommissioning costs. Once again, we have a case where the clean-up costs from the U.K.'s nuclear weapons program is being lumped together with decommissioning costs for commercial nuclear reactors. Please stop by, and, as always, keep your contributions factual, and back up your conclusions with links to online sources.
Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Electricity, Environment, Energy
Hello everyone,That's the general rule we follow here, and I'm glad to see Potential Energy doing the same. As always, be sure to stop by and contribute to their debate, and be sure to come with your reference materials.
I'm responsible for moderating the comments that get posted here. Please note that from now on I will only approve comments that attribute the source of any figures quoted.
Thanks,
Samuel Rae
Outreach Officer, Institute of Physics
UPDATE: Here's a post where we need some of our supporters to take a stand -- a discussion about decommissioning costs. Once again, we have a case where the clean-up costs from the U.K.'s nuclear weapons program is being lumped together with decommissioning costs for commercial nuclear reactors. Please stop by, and, as always, keep your contributions factual, and back up your conclusions with links to online sources.
Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Electricity, Environment, Energy
Comments