Skip to main content

Canada Nuclear Update

By Eric McErlain
As we reported on Monday, Dwight Duncan, energy minister for Ontario, announced a 20-year plan to upgrade the province's energy infrastructure yesterday, one that includes provisions to build new reactors and refurbish exisiting nuclear capacity, while investing an equal amount of money in renewable energy.

The plan is getting a positive reception. Here's the Toronto Star:
Energy Minister Dwight Duncan has developed a prudent blueprint for ensuring Ontarians will have an increasingly clean supply of power to meet their needs over the next 20 years. The plan is a mix of power sources --— nuclear, hydro, natural gas, wind --— that strikes the best long-term balance considering cost, reliability and environmental concerns.

Under the plan unveiled yesterday, the province has opted over the next 20 years to refurbish existing nuclear plants, build new reactors on those sites, double the amount of renewable power from sources such as hydroelectric and wind, and heavily promote conservation.
And from the London Free Press:
While details remain sketchy, the Ontario government appears to be taking a balanced, sensible approach to meeting the province's future energy needs.

A reliable energy supply is vital to Ontario's economy. And the massive disruption that can be caused in ordinary people's lives was made abundantly clear by the blackout of 2003.

Energy Minister Dwight Duncan's plan calls for a broad mix, including increased nuclear power and a push for conservation -- with less nuclear and more conservation than expected.
And despite the fact that the plan relies on "more conservation than expected," all the usual suspects are lining up in opposition.

Stephen Aplin says he's ready for the debate:
Until now, the Ontario electricity debate has been long on politically correct platitudes about renewable and alternative forms of generation coupled with conservation, and short on credible plans for filling the ten-thousand-megawatt gap between electricity demand and supply. There has been almost no regard for actual, believable numbers -- either in terms of the amounts of electricity Ontarians need to continue living as an advanced, industrial society in a middle-latitude climate, or the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with electricity generation.

In such a void, anybody can say anything -- and they have. But now that the battle is well and truly joined, we'’ll see which arguments stand and which collapse from their own internal contradictions.
Keep your cool my friends, because the facts are on our side. Click here for a statement from Patrick Moore.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more