Natural Gas Notes

Here are a few related items on natural gas that caught my eye yesterday. I would have posted these earlier, but Blogger had an afternoon outage and I couldn't log on. First, here's a story from yesterday's Energy Daily by Jeff Beattie:

Bidding for incremental LNG supply in "very fierce, and it is only going to get more so," said James Straughan, manager of LNG supply and trading for BP Energy at the 11th annual LDC (local distributing company) Forum Northeast.

Overseas competition for supply is one reason why -- to the surprise of many market observers -- U.S. LNG terminals were operating at less than half capacity at times last year, even while U.S. gas markets were clearly craving gas and pushing prices to sustained, very high levels.

Meanwhile, back in the Gulf of Mexico:

Analyst Ole Slorer said GlobalSantaFe's announcement that it was sending four of its jackup rigs to Saudi Arabia, in a deal with Saudi Aramco, is part of an ongoing exodus to the Middle East that could cut shelf production in the Gulf of Mexico by as much as 20% over the next 18 months.

These kinds of announcements, Slorer told investors in a research note Monday, tighten the supply of rigs left to address the spot market in the Gulf of Mexico and could have "severe implications" on medium term natural gas production capacity.

Thanks to Red State for the Forbes pointer. And finally, here are some data points on estimated natural gas prices my boss culled from the latest EIA Short-Term Energy Outlook, released June 6, 2006:

Expected 2006 average: $7.74 per thousand cubic feet (mcf)

Expected 2007 average: $8.81 per mcf

2006 expected average of $7.74 is down $1.12 from 2005 average: "“The respite is expected to be short-lived. Concerns about potential future supply tightness and continuing pressure from high oil market prices will likely drive spot natural gas prices to just over $10.00 per mcf this coming December and January, "“ EIA says.

Here's hoping for another mild Winter.

Technorati tags: Energy, Electricity, Natural Gas

Comments

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog