Skip to main content

One Vote For Science

By Eric McErlain
Over at Potential Energy, Gia Milinovich is striking a blow against Luddism:
Investing in advanced technologies creates far more money than is spent. Queen Isabella and Spain reaped untold fortunes from her investment into Columbus’ journeys. All mankind has continued to benefit from the scientific and technological knowledge gained from the six Moon landings. Why does anyone in their right mind believe that scrimping and saving our energy is a ‘long term’ solution?

If we look at nuclear power as our first step to becoming a space-faring species (I mean, we’re not going to get to Mars using hydro-electric-power, are we?), then to me the idea of spending time and money on developing and building wind farms seems ludicrous. Almost as ridiculous as someone in the 19th Century saying that we shouldn’t develop steam engines for industry and should instead make more efficient water wheels. Actually, not ‘almost’, it’s more ridiculous than that because we have the advantage of hindsight, we can see very clearly that, throughout history, taking the ‘Science’ route has advanced civilisation time and time again. And that believing in power, beauty or perfection of ‘Nature’, that ‘Nature’ knows best, has only ever hindered our development.
Read the rest right now.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
Such a refreshing antidote to the misanthropic ideologies of the environmentalists and perfectly reflects my own thinking. Either we 'settle down' to a energy scrimping lifestyle waiting for some natural disaster to finish us off or we head into space(or the Moon and Mars, at any rate). We may be the only intelligent life in the universe - reason enough to aim for the stars!
June 19, 2006 at 11:59 PM
Anonymous said…
I don't think we'll ever colonize space - the energy requirements are just too great (read Charlie Stross's essay here).

The most that I see happening is some workers temporarily travelling to Mars or the Asteroid Belt* in order to control resource-extraction robots.

*Not the Moon, as it's close enough that the robots could be controlled directly from Earth.

The idea of space colonization was the creation of Technocracy - the third modernist ideology of the 20th century (after Communism and Fascism). Space colonization is to Technocracy what Lebensraum is to Nazism or what World Revolution is to Communism.
June 30, 2008 at 3:53 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more