Skip to main content

Questions on the Reactor Oversight Process

By Eric McErlain
In light of the fact that a number of companies are preparing applications to build new nuclear plants, NRC Chairman Nils Diaz thinks there are limits to the amount of work his agency can perform:
The number of companies that want to build nuclear reactors is increasing faster than expected, threatening to rise beyond regulators' capacity to process applications, the top U.S. nuclear regulator said.

"The number of applications, the number of players, keeps changing," Nils Diaz, chairman of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, said at a news conference in Washington on Friday. "There's a time in which we cannot do more. We are approaching that level."

The commission, known as NRC, is preparing to accept the first applications to build new nuclear reactors since the 1979 accident at the Three Mile Island plant in Pennsylvania. Utilities including Dominion Resources Inc., Southern Co. and Duke Energy Corp. have told regulators they expect to begin submitting applications next year.

Diaz estimated the commission can handle 15 to 16 applications for new nuclear plants at one time. The applications will take about 30 months to review, he said. That time frame could drop to 24 months as the commission and the industry gain experience with the process.
This afternoon at 4:00 p.m. U.S. EDT, the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a hearing on NRC's reactor oversight process. Follow that link 10 minutes prior for information on a Webcast of the meeting.

And later this week, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee will hold a hearing on the regulatory process for new and existing nuclear plants.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Matthew66 said…
With the NRC's announcement, I wouldn't mind betting that utilities drop the idea of applying for COLs for single units. I would expect that utilities will apply to licence as many reactors as they think a chosen site could handle, get the licence, and then decide how many to actually build.
June 19, 2006 at 1:36 PM
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

By
Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...
Post a Comment
Read more