Skip to main content

Media Alert

By Eric McErlain
My NEI colleague Lisa Stiles-Shell just got back from a taping of the Glenn Beck Show that will air tonight on CNN Headline News at 7:00 p.m. U.S. EDT (repeats at 9:00 p.m. and 12:00 a.m.).

The format was set up to resemble the Dating Game, where each "bachelor(ette)"” was a different source of energy. Glenn posed questions to them after which he chose which one he wanted for his new source of energy -- he did not know the type of energy each person represented until after he made his selection. Lisa represented nuclear, of course, and coal and hydrogen rounded out the panel. Here's a note I just got from Lisa:
I just got back from the taping and they tell me it will be on tonight. I missed one talking point I wanted to get in there(see if you notice it!) but it was difficult with the way it was structured and very weird to be in a little room by myself (except for Trish) staring into a remotely operated camera with no video to see, only sound. I couldn't see the host or the other guests, I could just hear them! Overall I thought it went all right and Trish said I did well. I won't spoil the surprise by telling you who won...
I'll give you a hint who won. Be sure to tune in.

UPDATE: Lisa now tells us that this program will air on Monday night, same time. Be sure to watch then.

Technorati tags: , , , , ,

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Wednesday Update

By
From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...
Post a Comment
Read more

Fluor Invests in NuScale

By
You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...
1 comment
Read more

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

By
Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...
23 comments
Read more