Thanks to John Wheeler...

...The host of This Week in Nuclear, for sticking around NEI longer than he had to today to deliver a presentation on Podcasting. Our staff really enjoyed it, and we'll be working to implement what we learned today in the coming weeks and months. When you get a chance, be sure to give John's latest episode a listen.

Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Energy, Technology, Environment, Electricity

Comments

Rod Adams said…

Hey Erin - If NEI is interested in more information about Podcasting, please let me know. I have been doing a lot of research on the topic. As you know, I am in your neck of the woods.

In case you do not remember, my own podcast - The Atomic Show - is available at http://atomic.thepodcastnetwork.com

I think we are just two or three episodes behind John's excellent "This Week In Nuclear", having just published show number 18 this morning.

Rod

June 14, 2006 at 10:05 PM

J Wheeler said…

Hey Rod!

You and Shane are definitely catching up with me! Your show #18 was an excellent overview of the nuclear industry in the UK. Thanks!

I was at NEI to particiate in an industry taskforce meeting to discuss workforce planning, and Eric grabbed the opportunity to drag me (willingly) into some staff training.

I was very impressed by the level of interest on the part of the NEI staff and the results of their brainstorming on various ways they might use podcasting.

John

June 15, 2006 at 11:20 PM

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap...

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog