Skip to main content

Glenn Gets Nuclear

Eric thought our readers would be interested in learning about my experience as a guest on the Glenn Beck show on CNN Headline News. If you missed it, I found a transcript here.

I was asked last week by our media relations folks here at NEI if I would be interested in filling in for colleague Mary Quillian on a talk show. I don’t have a lot of media experience but there is no better way to improve than to actually do it so I agreed. That’s when I discovered that it was a dating game format. I was a bit wary but was assured by my coworkers that I would be fine.

At this point we weren’t even sure that the segment would happen. Apparently the producers were having trouble finding people to represent other energy technologies.

But by Friday morning everything was a go. The producer called and gave me an outline of what would happen. That afternoon I arrived at the CNN office in Washington and was rushed through security and then to makeup. I was given an ear bud and a microphone, led to a little room with lights, a chair, a stand and a humongous camera and...was left alone. Luckily, my coworker and media guru Trish Conrad arrived so I had someone to talk to. Eventually the technician came back and told me that soon I would hear Glenn and the producers through my ear piece and showed me where to look when they began talking to me. When I spoke to the producers they told me that I would be energy bachelor #1 and when I heard the introduction I should smile and wave to the camera like people do on game shows. That explains my cheesy grin in the beginning.

I was surprised to learn that there wasn’t any video feed and that I would not be able to see Glenn or any of the other guests. I could just hear them. Even the camera was remotely operated. It is very strange to talk into a blank screen!

I thought the show was a bit goofy but I wasn’t above playing along. I was able to get in most of my talking points: Nuclear is safe, clean, and reliable. The one thing I missed mentioning is that it has the lowest production cost of anything that doesn’t require building a dam. When I won, I thought I would have more time at the end to get that point in, but then Glenn started talking about Iran and I can only guess that the “lead shroud in Russia” thing was about Chernobyl. Grrr...I would have loved to take a crack at that!

I thought the coal representative did a clever job with the question about polluting the night sky. I didn’t realize that the coal industry has been able to increase output AND reduce emissions at the same time. I’ll have to find those numbers. I wonder how he felt about the “fake sponsor” ad after the segment. It was very unflattering for coal!

I thought the hydrogen representative was a bit confusing. We already know hydrogen as a fuel source? Maybe if you work on the space shuttle…But hey, I won’t complain. If he wants a diverse supply of hydrogen, he probably knows that nuclear will have to play a role!

And I have to admit that I gritted my teeth when I watched the show and saw that the next segment was about Iran and nuclear weapons. Argh. I work so hard to explain the huge differences that separate commercial power and weapons and a talk-show host can neutralize that at will. Ah well, obviously there is still work to be done!

Overall it was an interesting learning experience. Thanks to those that watched!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Fluor Invests in NuScale

You know, it’s kind of sad that no one is willing to invest in nuclear energy anymore. Wait, what? NuScale Power celebrated the news of its company-saving $30 million investment from Fluor Corp. Thursday morning with a press conference in Washington, D.C. Fluor is a design, engineering and construction company involved with some 20 plants in the 70s and 80s, but it has not held interest in a nuclear energy company until now. Fluor, which has deep roots in the nuclear industry, is betting big on small-scale nuclear energy with its NuScale investment. "It's become a serious contender in the last decade or so," John Hopkins, [Fluor’s group president in charge of new ventures], said. And that brings us to NuScale, which had run into some dark days – maybe not as dark as, say, Solyndra, but dire enough : Earlier this year, the Securities Exchange Commission filed an action against NuScale's lead investor, The Michael Kenwood Group. The firm "misap

An Ohio School Board Is Working to Save Nuclear Plants

Ohio faces a decision soon about its two nuclear reactors, Davis-Besse and Perry, and on Wednesday, neighbors of one of those plants issued a cry for help. The reactors’ problem is that the price of electricity they sell on the high-voltage grid is depressed, mostly because of a surplus of natural gas. And the reactors do not get any revenue for the other benefits they provide. Some of those benefits are regional – emissions-free electricity, reliability with months of fuel on-site, and diversity in case of problems or price spikes with gas or coal, state and federal payroll taxes, and national economic stimulus as the plants buy fuel, supplies and services. Some of the benefits are highly localized, including employment and property taxes. One locality is already feeling the pinch: Oak Harbor on Lake Erie, home to Davis-Besse. The town has a middle school in a building that is 106 years old, and an elementary school from the 1950s, and on May 2 was scheduled to have a referendu

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin