Skip to main content

Patrick Moore Profiled in the Wall Street Journal

Today's Wall Street Journal profiles our friend, Dr. Patrick Moore of Greenspirit Strategies, and highlights his support of nuclear energy.

That's a current picture at inset. And believe it or not, that's Dr. Moore under the "P" in Greenpeace in the larger photo.

My how things change.

And other folks are beginning to notice.

UPDATE: To read the views of others following Dr. Moore's story, click here.

Comments

Matthew66 said…
Until there is a leadership coup at Greenpeace, we needn't expect any change in their attitude toward nuclear energy. Same is true of Friends of the Earth, the Sierra Club etc.
Brian Mays said…
Of course. The most likely and desirable scenario is that they (like NIRS) continue to become increasingly irrelevant.
gunter said…
oh, did you intentionally leave NIRS out of the conversion to nuclear power's second coming?

You guys forget, actually, if you think its about "leadership coup," you don't have a clue; good leadership makes sense and has the trust and support of its clued up mass membership.

You think "Greenpeace" for clear cut logging or toxic dumping is going to build a mass movement? Ask Mr. Moore how he's doing on that one.

Same's true of his phony "Go Nukes" ad scheme-concocted and funded from the polluters' boardrooms.

If Mr. Moore had a book title to his credit at least we could try to get him on the Colbert Report.

How's "Our Friend the Atom: The Rerun"?

Think he'd be interested? NEI can ghost write it, right?

gunter, nirs

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…