Skip to main content

On NEI and NEI Nuclear Notes

Over at Energy Buzz, John Salera has taken note of our existence:
NEI Nuclear Notes, which appears to be a blog funded by the Nuclear Energy Institute...
This might be a good time to remind folks that indeed, we are affiliated with the Nuclear Energy Institute -- something we've disclosed from our first post.

My then-boss, NEI Vice President Scott Peterson, asked me to start a blog for NEI to use as a testbed to explore how the industry could use blogging in its communications efforts. Despite the fact that I was asked to do this, blogging for NEI Nuclear Notes is a purely voluntary activity. So while many of my colleagues both here at NEI and in the industry have been kind enough to donate their time and energy, nobody here is required to blog. Furthermore, I'm not even on the Communications staff anymore, as the speech writing function here at NEI was moved into the Policy Development Department in October 2005.

As for John's guess that NEI Nuclear Notes is "funded" by NEI, I had to stifle a laugh. Don't get me wrong, I'm grateful for the support we've gotten from senior management. But even though we've been in business for nearly 16 months, NEI hasn't spent one dime on this blog, and it never will. I promised that we could publish this blog at no incremental cost to NEI, and I meant it. Here's hoping more companies and individuals in the nuclear energy business follow our example.

UPDATE: John has a response. BTW -- I wasn't taking exception to anything John wrote, I just thought it represented an opportunity to explain who we are and what we're about. And we wish John well too.

Technorati tags: , , , ,

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

Nuclear Utility Moves Up in Credit Ratings, Bank is "Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy"

Some positive signs that nuclear utilities can continue to receive positive ratings even while they finance new nuclear plants for the first time in decades: Wells Fargo upgrades SCANA to Outperform from Market Perform Wells analyst says, "YTD, SCG shares have underperformed the Regulated Electrics (total return +2% vs. +9%). Shares trade at 11.3X our 10E EPS, a modest discount to the peer group median of 11.8X. We view the valuation as attractive given a comparatively constructive regulatory environment and potential for above-average long-term EPS growth prospects ... Comfortable with Nuclear Strategy. SCG plans to participate in the development of two regulated nuclear units at a cost of $6.3B, raising legitimate concerns regarding financing and construction. We have carefully considered the risks and are comfortable with SCG’s strategy based on a highly constructive political & regulatory environment, manageable financing needs stretched out over 10 years, strong partners...

Wednesday Update

From NEI’s Japan micro-site: NRC, Industry Concur on Many Post-Fukushima Actions Industry/Regulatory/Political Issues • There is a “great deal of alignment” between the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and the industry on initial steps to take at America’s nuclear energy facilities in response to the nuclear accident in Japan, Charles Pardee, the chief operating officer of Exelon Generation Co., said at an agency briefing today. The briefing gave stakeholders an opportunity to discuss staff recommendations for near-term actions the agency may take at U.S. facilities. PowerPoint slides from the meeting are on the NRC website. • The International Atomic Energy Agency board has approved a plan that calls for inspectors to evaluate reactor safety at nuclear energy facilities every three years. Governments may opt out of having their country’s facilities inspected. Also approved were plans to maintain a rapid response team of experts ready to assist facility operators recoverin...