Skip to main content

McDermott Announces Re-Organization, Creates Babcock and Wilcox Companies

Off this morning's wire:
McDermott International, Inc. (NYSE:MDR) ("McDermott" or the "Company") announced today a strategic realignment of its businesses operating within the power industry. Effective January 1, 2007, the Company will consolidate its BWX Technologies, Inc. subsidiary ("BWXT") and The Babcock & Wilcox Company subsidiary ("B&W"), into a single entity operating as The Babcock & Wilcox Companies ("BWC").

Through BWC, all of McDermott's nuclear and fossil power products and service offerings will be positioned to best fulfill the changing requirements of the Company's power customers, both commercial and governmental. "Leveraging our power offerings, talented employee base and industry expertise from both organizations will benefit our customers, work force, and shareholders," said Bruce W. Wilkinson, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of McDermott.

The Babcock & Wilcox Companies will be under the direct leadership of John A. Fees, who has been named Chief Executive Officer of BWC. Fees, age 49, will continue to report to Bruce Wilkinson in this new role. John Fees is a 27-year McDermott veteran who most recently served as President and Chief Operating Officer of BWXT, a position held since January 2003. During a career of increasing responsibility, John Fees also previously served as President of both BWXT Services, Inc. and the Diamond Power Division, a wholly-owned subsidiary of B&W. David L. Keller will continue to lead McDermott's power generation activities and beginning on January 1, 2007 will report to Fees. BWC will appoint leadership positions within the new organization as it approaches the effective date.
Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Anonymous said…
After reading :
Barberton firm reunited with spinoff
Scientists to play key role in global fusion reactor

I thought you would be interested in looking at these energy technologies:

Aneutronic Fusion: Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems

Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion

He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts


Terra Preta Soil CO2 Sequestration:

Here is a great article that high lights this pyrolysis
process , ( http://www.eprida.com/hydro/ ) which could use existing infrastructure to provide Charcoal sustainable Agriculture , Syn-Fuels, and a variation of this process would also work as well for H2 and Charcoal-Fertilizer production, while sequestering CO2 from Coal fired plants to build soils at large scales , be sure to read the See an initial analysis. of this technology to clean up Coal fired power plants.


Soil erosion, energy scarcity, excess greenhouse gas all answered through regenerative carbon management

I feel Terra Preta soil technology is the greatest Ironies since Tobacco.
That is, an invention of pre-Columbian American culture, destroyed by western disease, may well be the savior of industrial western society. As inversely Tobacco, over time has gotten back at same society by killing more of us than the entire pre-Columbian population.

Regards,

Erich J. Knight
Shenandoah Gardens
McGaheysville, VA
E-mail: shengar@aol.com
(540) 289-9750
Anonymous said…
After reading :
Barberton firm reunited with spinoff
Scientists to play key role in global fusion reactor

I thought you would be interested in looking at these energy technologies:

Aneutronic Fusion: Here I am not talking about the big science ITER project taking thirty years, but the several small alternative plasma fusion efforts.

There are three companies pursuing hydrogen-boron plasma toroid fusion, Paul Koloc, Prometheus II, Eric Lerner, Focus Fusion and Clint Seward of Electron Power Systems

Vincent Page (a technology officer at GE!!) gave a presentation at the 05 6th symposium on current trends in international fusion research , which high lights the need to fully fund three different approaches to P-B11 fusion

He quotes costs and time to development of P-B11 Fusion as tens of million $, and years verses the many decades and ten Billion plus $ projected for ITER and other "Big" science efforts


Terra Preta Soil CO2 Sequestration:

Here is a great article that high lights this pyrolysis
process , ( http://www.eprida.com/hydro/ ) which could use existing infrastructure to provide Charcoal sustainable Agriculture , Syn-Fuels, and a variation of this process would also work as well for H2 and Charcoal-Fertilizer production, while sequestering CO2 from Coal fired plants to build soils at large scales , be sure to read the See an initial analysis. of this technology to clean up Coal fired power plants.


Soil erosion, energy scarcity, excess greenhouse gas all answered through regenerative carbon management

I feel Terra Preta soil technology is the greatest Ironies since Tobacco.
That is, an invention of pre-Columbian American culture, destroyed by western disease, may well be the savior of industrial western society. As inversely Tobacco, over time has gotten back at same society by killing more of us than the entire pre-Columbian population.

Regards,

Erich J. Knight
Shenandoah Gardens
McGaheysville, VA
E-mail: shengar@aol.com
(540) 289-9750

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …