Lisa Mascaro of the Las Vegas Sun took a tour of Yucca Mountain with new project head Ward Sproat, and had some interesting things to say:
Five minutes with Sproat and you begin to see why the Energy Department chose him. He tells you plainly and succinctly what he knows. Then he says just as clearly what it is he doesn't yet know. It's straight talk, the kind that inspires confidence: If he can run nuclear power plants for private industry, as he has for years, he can puff life into this gasping project.Technorati tags: Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Power, Used Fuel, Energy, Technology, Electricity, Yucca Mountain, Nevada, Ward Sproat
[...]
More than anything, the tunnel feels like a driveway to a house that has yet to be built. The waste is to be set in 42 miles of storage space branching off from the tunnel. Digging it could take decades.
Sproat worries about such a prolonged building program. Yucca Mountain should be built fast, he said, as soon as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission gives the project a green light - now pegged at 2011.
Also, he sees the construction challenges as less daunting than the job of fixing a management culture that has allowed sloppy documentation.
Comments
On the isle of Anglesey, off North Wales, the UK Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) owned site at Wylfa is set to cease generation in 2010.
The decommissioning process of the last Magnox reactor in Britain will then start, first with defuelling then site clear up from about 2012-13.
Colleagues can contribute to the current debate going on as to what should happen to this site in the future. This is part of the NDA's End Uses and End States strategy.
Please go to the questionnaire and leave helpful and practical comments and then vote. Open to all, you just have to say where you're from.
See http://www.anglesey-today.com/wylfa.html and click on questionnaire.
Please share this information with others who could make a timely contribution. Deadline for vote and comments is 20 September 2006.
Though we agree on many things, I do not agree that we need to spend billions of dollars on digging holes in the Nevada desert. The material is safe where it is.
Maybe someday in the very distant future there will be a need to do something more permanent with the left overs from nuclear fission plant operation, but I think we have not even begun to think about all of the potential uses for the rare materials that are produced by breaking heavy metals.
The stuff just does not take up much space and it certainly does not cost much - compared to the value of the energy produced - to put it into a container and watch it for the foreseeable future.
Yucca is a waste of money unless you are a cost-plus contractor.
I know that some in the industry think we need unanimity on this issue, but I think that what we need is an understanding that the "waste issue" is not the real problem. The real problem is that we have allowed and encouraged people that do not like nuclear power to use a non issue to constipate the industry for far too long.
Besides, if the rare materials resulting from fission do turn out to be useful in the future, then all is not lost if Yucca Mountain goes ahead. If we discover a use for them in the near future, then Yucca Mountain will still be open, and we can haul the stuff out. If it is later than that, well, by then there should be plenty more nuclear power plants worldwide producing more of the stuff. Otherwise, there's no point in even talking about reprocessing; let's just bury the stuff and be done with it. Return it to the ground, where it came from.
I understand what you are saying, Rod, and technically you're correct. However, this is more than a technical issue.