Skip to main content

New Advertising From NEI

I wanted to share the latest television advertising that NEI has been running here in the Washington area as well as nationally on CNN:



Google Video is a great vehicle for campaigns like this, and an inexpensive way of extending your reach on the Web. I urge everyone to give it a try.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Starvid, Sweden said…
Oh my God, American marketing is insanely cheesy.

Sure it's all true what's said in the commercial, but it's till excruciating cheesy.

And I bet you won't publish this comment.
Kirk Sorensen said…
In the 30 seconds of that commercial, there must have been many frames that you could have used as your "still" frame--but the one that made it is highly unsettling.

I'm not sure this commercial would make me feel any better about nuclear energy--probably more scared than before.
Kirk Sorensen said…
The video states that nuclear energy (which I take to mean LWRs) reduces our dependence on foreign energy sources. That's not really very accurate.

By and large, nuclear energy from LWRs displaces domestic coal for electricity generation. While a very good thing, it's not the same as displacing foreign energy (petroleum).

I think it's a bit disingenuous to present nuclear electricity generation as a replacement for foreign oil, unless you happen to be driving an electric car.
Eric McErlain said…
Not at all Kirk. We've made the point here several times that nuclear can displace natural gas-fired electric generation. And because North American natural gas reserves can't keep up with demand over the long term, we'll be forced to import it.
Kirk Sorensen said…
That's why I said "by and large" Eric. There are certain niches where nuclear electricity generation might be displacing foreign energy sources, but by and large nuclear energy displaces domestic coal.

Don't get me wrong, that's a good thing, but it's not the same as sticking it to the mullahs of Iran.

Popular posts from this blog

Missing the Point about Pennsylvania’s Nuclear Plants

A group that includes oil and gas companies in Pennsylvania released a study on Monday that argues that twenty years ago, planners underestimated the value of nuclear plants in the electricity market. According to the group, that means the state should now let the plants close.

Huh?

The question confronting the state now isn’t what the companies that owned the reactors at the time of de-regulation got or didn’t get. It’s not a question of whether they were profitable in the '80s, '90s and '00s. It’s about now. Business works by looking at the present and making projections about the future.

Is losing the nuclear plants what’s best for the state going forward?

Pennsylvania needs clean air. It needs jobs. And it needs protection against over-reliance on a single fuel source.


What the reactors need is recognition of all the value they provide. The electricity market is depressed, and if electricity is treated as a simple commodity, with no regard for its benefit to clean air o…

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

A Billion Miles Under Nuclear Energy (Updated)

And the winner is…Cassini-Huygens, in triple overtime.

The spaceship conceived in 1982 and launched fifteen years later, will crash into Saturn on September 15, after a mission of 19 years and 355 days, powered by the audacity and technical prowess of scientists and engineers from 17 different countries, and 72 pounds of plutonium.

The mission was so successful that it was extended three times; it was intended to last only until 2008.

Since April, the ship has been continuing to orbit Saturn, swinging through the 1,500-mile gap between the planet and its rings, an area not previously explored. This is a good maneuver for a spaceship nearing the end of its mission, since colliding with a rock could end things early.

Cassini will dive a little deeper and plunge toward Saturn’s surface, where it will transmit data until it burns up in the planet’s atmosphere. The radio signal will arrive here early Friday morning, Eastern time. A NASA video explains.

In the years since Cassini has launc…