Skip to main content

New Advertising From NEI

I wanted to share the latest television advertising that NEI has been running here in the Washington area as well as nationally on CNN:



Google Video is a great vehicle for campaigns like this, and an inexpensive way of extending your reach on the Web. I urge everyone to give it a try.

Technorati tags: , , , , , , ,

Comments

Starvid, Sweden said…
Oh my God, American marketing is insanely cheesy.

Sure it's all true what's said in the commercial, but it's till excruciating cheesy.

And I bet you won't publish this comment.
Kirk Sorensen said…
In the 30 seconds of that commercial, there must have been many frames that you could have used as your "still" frame--but the one that made it is highly unsettling.

I'm not sure this commercial would make me feel any better about nuclear energy--probably more scared than before.
Kirk Sorensen said…
The video states that nuclear energy (which I take to mean LWRs) reduces our dependence on foreign energy sources. That's not really very accurate.

By and large, nuclear energy from LWRs displaces domestic coal for electricity generation. While a very good thing, it's not the same as displacing foreign energy (petroleum).

I think it's a bit disingenuous to present nuclear electricity generation as a replacement for foreign oil, unless you happen to be driving an electric car.
Eric McErlain said…
Not at all Kirk. We've made the point here several times that nuclear can displace natural gas-fired electric generation. And because North American natural gas reserves can't keep up with demand over the long term, we'll be forced to import it.
Kirk Sorensen said…
That's why I said "by and large" Eric. There are certain niches where nuclear electricity generation might be displacing foreign energy sources, but by and large nuclear energy displaces domestic coal.

Don't get me wrong, that's a good thing, but it's not the same as sticking it to the mullahs of Iran.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …