Skip to main content

Sarkozy in Japan, Workers for Fukushima

Nicolas_Sarkozy He is the first foreign leader to visit Japan since the earthquake there and he visits with an idea:

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is calling for new international nuclear safety standards, warning radiation leaks at Japan's Fukushima Power Plant could affect the entire world. Sarkozy is calling for nuclear officials from the G20 group of industrialized countries to discuss the issue during a May meeting.

Nothing disputable here, as long as it’s recognized that a one-size-fits–all set of safety standards could overburden one country with rules that fit another country better. Landlocked countries don’t risk tsunamis, after all.

Japanese Prime Minister Naoto Kan was as polite as the situation warranted:

By studying that [the causes of the Fukushima accident], he said Japan will have to consider what measures can be taken to prevent a recurrence, and this should be agreed upon internationally.

Fair enough. Kan has a lot on his hands, including a large displaced population, so this might not be the moment for helpful comments. Tomorrow can wait until today ends.

Regardless, Sarkozy seems to have no hesitation on nuclear energy.

He said everyone is working hard to reduce CO2 emissions from power generation. But there are not hundreds of solutions to reduce emissions, he said, and that is why this is not a question of choice, but of nuclear safety, because there is no alternative. He also said  alternative energy plans cannot replace nuclear power plants, so safety standards must be strengthened.

True enough – Sarkozy says here what seems to be the emerging consensus (outside of Germany, of course) – that the world has set a goal that cannot be reached without nuclear energy. He might have waited for the IAEA’s safety conference later this year to unveil a call for international standards, but he has the reality about right.

---

This is interesting:

A U.S. recruiter is hiring nuclear power workers in the United States to help Japan gain control of the stricken Fukushima Daiichi plant, which has been spewing radiation.

And this is heartening:

So far, the firm has already signed up some workers who will be flying to Japan on Sunday.

Melanson said there will be less than 10 workers in the initial group. Others are expected to follow later, he added.

Melanson is Joe Melanson, a recruiter at specialist nuclear industry staffing firm Bartlett Nuclear in Plymouth, Massachusetts. The speed at which Melanson is trying to recruit workers has probably limited the number of people in the first batch and it will be interesting to see how many Americans and others head over to help out ultimately.

President Nicolas Sarkozy.

Comments

jimwg said…
I hope Sarkozy and others recognize that it's crucial to not only address the physical problem but to educate the public that a massive earthquake instigated this and not a major failure of normal operation, as well educating the public that radiation isn't a bogeyman. If the public isn't able to discrimate this and that that there are different types of reactor technologies, there will be a throw-the-baby-out-with-the-bathwater rejection of nuclear energy wholesale, no matter how advanced and safer those technologies are -- including thermonuclear fusion.

James Greenidge

Popular posts from this blog

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

How Much Land Does Nuclear, Wind and Solar Really Need?

Not too long ago, we reviewed a report that looked at nuclear energy (and other energy sources) as biodiversity agents. This had to do, in part, with the amount of land a facility needs to function. Nuclear energy and fossil fuel plants use relatively little, wind farms and solar arrays quite a lot of land . Based on an objective and transparent analysis of our sustainable energy choices, we have come to the evidence-based conclusion that nuclear energy is a good option for biodiversity conservation (and society in general) and that other alternatives to fossil fuels should be subjected to the same cost–benefit analyses (in terms of biodiversity and climate outcomes, as well as sociopolitical imperatives) before accepting or dismissing them. Writer Barry Brook, who collected 75 scientists to endorse his paper, is interested in land use as it impacts flora and fauna. Biodiversity concerns do not get as much play as they might – and, when they do, it annoys many when land is withdraw...