Skip to main content

Senator Supports Overturning West Virginia's Ban on Nuclear Energy

West Virginia is the largest coal producer east of the Mississippi and generates nearly all of its electricity with coal-fired plants. Even so, some state legislators, mindful of both environmental and economic factors, think the state's 1996 ban on nuclear energy should be overturned. Sen. Brooks McCabe says the ban is inconsistent with West Virginia's position as an “energy state”:
If we’re an energy state, we ought to say we’re an energy state and not exclude anyone.
While McCabe doesn’t see a nuclear plant in West Virginia’s future anytime soon, even if the ban were overturned, he believes the United States needs to become self-sufficient where energy is concerned and that “nuclear will have some part of that equation.” In particular, he envisions small, scalable nuclear plants being built:
I would suggest that at some point in the future … you’re going to see much smaller, in some ways more mobile, nuclear power plants—little mini-plants, almost like you see in some of these natural gas turbines that are out there.
While the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan has renewed concerns about nuclear energy, McCabe notes that the plant’s problems were caused by a tsunami—something West Virginia doesn’t have to worry about, he said:
How big nuclear energy will be remains to be seen. Probably less substantial than it would have been prior to what’s happened in Japan. But I think technologies are changing and improving.
Making the United States self-sufficient in energy will require a mix of renewable energy, coal, gas, hydro, geothermal and nuclear, McCabe said. At the same time, he said, the nation must balance environmental requirements with the need to keep electricity affordable:
I have a real concern about maintaining affordable cost of electricity in this state so our industry can be competitive at the global level. …If we’re not careful, we’re going to price ourselves out of manufacturing, and that would be just an unmitigated disaster.
McCabe repeatedly has supported legislation to overturn West Virginia’s ban on nuclear energy. A number of other states also are looking at similar action. For example, the Minnesota House and Senate both passed bills in February that would eliminate the state’s moratorium on nuclear energy. It remains to be seen how the accident in Japan may affect plans for new nuclear plants. Duke Energy, for one, is sticking to its plans to develop a new reactor, while studying lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi, according to Chief Executive Officer Jim Rogers.

State Sen. Brooks McCabe

Comments

Anonymous said…
I say no to ever have a nuclear power plant in West Virginia for any reason.
Nuclear power is not the way to go, especially at the state of are economy right now, we need to invest in a better power source. I think we can find a better way for the 21st century and not a nuclear crap hole. For the most part the waste needs to be disposed of properly and not stored somewhere else, and that's not plausible in are time right now, and further more is dangerous. I no they've done tests on them but that doesn't mean there safe. I have my reasons but I will not stand for a nuclear power plant in West Virginia EVER.

Signed: A concerned Citizen of West Virginia.

Popular posts from this blog

How Nanomaterials Can Make Nuclear Reactors Safer and More Efficient

The following is a guest post from Matt Wald, senior communications advisor at NEI. Follow Matt on Twitter at @MattLWald.

From the batteries in our cell phones to the clothes on our backs, "nanomaterials" that are designed molecule by molecule are working their way into our economy and our lives. Now there’s some promising work on new materials for nuclear reactors.

Reactors are a tough environment. The sub atomic particles that sustain the chain reaction, neutrons, are great for splitting additional uranium atoms, but not all of them hit a uranium atom; some of them end up in various metal components of the reactor. The metal is usually a crystalline structure, meaning it is as orderly as a ladder or a sheet of graph paper, but the neutrons rearrange the atoms, leaving some infinitesimal voids in the structure and some areas of extra density. The components literally grow, getting longer and thicker. The phenomenon is well understood and designers compensate for it with a …

Why America Needs the MOX Facility

If Isaiah had been a nuclear engineer, he’d have loved this project. And the Trump Administration should too, despite the proposal to eliminate it in the FY 2018 budget.

The project is a massive factory near Aiken, S.C., that will take plutonium from the government’s arsenal and turn it into fuel for civilian power reactors. The plutonium, made by the United States during the Cold War in a competition with the Soviet Union, is now surplus, and the United States and the Russian Federation jointly agreed to reduce their stocks, to reduce the chance of its use in weapons. Over two thousand construction workers, technicians and engineers are at work to enable the transformation.

Carrying Isaiah’s “swords into plowshares” vision into the nuclear field did not originate with plutonium. In 1993, the United States and Russia began a 20-year program to take weapons-grade uranium out of the Russian inventory, dilute it to levels appropriate for civilian power plants, and then use it to produce…

Nuclear Is a Long-Term Investment for Ohio that Will Pay Big

With 50 different state legislative calendars, more than half of them adjourn by June, and those still in session throughout the year usually take a recess in the summer. So springtime is prime time for state legislative activity. In the next few weeks, legislatures are hosting hearings and calling for votes on bills that have been battered back and forth in the capital halls.

On Tuesday, The Ohio Public Utilities Committee hosted its third round of hearings on the Zero Emissions Nuclear Resources Program, House Bill 178, and NEI’s Maria Korsnick testified before a jam-packed room of legislators.


Washingtonians parachuting into state debates can be a tricky platform, but in this case, Maria’s remarks provided national perspective that put the Ohio conundrum into context. At the heart of this debate is the impact nuclear plants have on local jobs and the local economy, and that nuclear assets should be viewed as “long-term investments” for the state. Of course, clean air and electrons …