Senator Supports Overturning West Virginia's Ban on Nuclear Energy

West Virginia is the largest coal producer east of the Mississippi and generates nearly all of its electricity with coal-fired plants. Even so, some state legislators, mindful of both environmental and economic factors, think the state's 1996 ban on nuclear energy should be overturned. Sen. Brooks McCabe says the ban is inconsistent with West Virginia's position as an “energy state”:

If we’re an energy state, we ought to say we’re an energy state and not exclude anyone.

While McCabe doesn’t see a nuclear plant in West Virginia’s future anytime soon, even if the ban were overturned, he believes the United States needs to become self-sufficient where energy is concerned and that “nuclear will have some part of that equation.” In particular, he envisions small, scalable nuclear plants being built:

I would suggest that at some point in the future … you’re going to see much smaller, in some ways more mobile, nuclear power plants—little mini-plants, almost like you see in some of these natural gas turbines that are out there.

While the accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant in Japan has renewed concerns about nuclear energy, McCabe notes that the plant’s problems were caused by a tsunami—something West Virginia doesn’t have to worry about, he said:

How big nuclear energy will be remains to be seen. Probably less substantial than it would have been prior to what’s happened in Japan. But I think technologies are changing and improving.

Making the United States self-sufficient in energy will require a mix of renewable energy, coal, gas, hydro, geothermal and nuclear, McCabe said. At the same time, he said, the nation must balance environmental requirements with the need to keep electricity affordable:

I have a real concern about maintaining affordable cost of electricity in this state so our industry can be competitive at the global level. …If we’re not careful, we’re going to price ourselves out of manufacturing, and that would be just an unmitigated disaster.

McCabe repeatedly has supported legislation to overturn West Virginia’s ban on nuclear energy. A number of other states also are looking at similar action. For example, the Minnesota House and Senate both passed bills in February that would eliminate the state’s moratorium on nuclear energy. It remains to be seen how the accident in Japan may affect plans for new nuclear plants. Duke Energy, for one, is sticking to its plans to develop a new reactor, while studying lessons learned from Fukushima Daiichi, according to Chief Executive Officer Jim Rogers.

State Sen. Brooks McCabe

Activists' Claims Distort Facts about Advanced Reactor Design

Below is from our rapid response team . Yesterday, regional anti-nuclear organizations asked federal nuclear energy regulators to launch an investigation into what it claims are “newly identified flaws” in Westinghouse’s advanced reactor design, the AP1000. During a teleconference releasing a report on the subject, participants urged the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to suspend license reviews of proposed AP1000 reactors. In its news release, even the groups making these allegations provide conflicting information on its findings. In one instance, the groups cite “dozens of corrosion holes” at reactor vessels and in another says that eight holes have been documented. In all cases, there is another containment mechanism that would provide a barrier to radiation release. Below, we examine why these claims are unwarranted and why the AP1000 design certification process should continue as designated by the NRC. Myth: In the AP1000 reactor design, the gap between the shield bu...

How many nuclear plants does it take to meet the world's energy needs?

Several weeks ago Joshua Pearce at Clarion University in Pennsylvania released a study titled “ Thermodynamic limitations to nuclear energy deployment as a greenhouse gas mitigation technology .” In the study he stated... nuclear energy production would have to increase by 10.5% per year from 2010 to 2050 to both replace fossil-fuel-energy use and meet the future energy demands. This line, of course, made the headlines and has been picked up by several outlets and blogs . When looking into his calculations for this statement, he made one assumption error that overstated the above sentence by nearly a factor of three. Page 121, Section 4.1 of the study states: Richard Smalley pointed out that in 2004, the global economy consumed the equivalent of 220 million barrels of oil per day, which converted into electricity terms is the equivalent of 14.5 TeraWatts (TW), or 14,500,000 MegaWatts (MW) (2005). … With a nuclear plant having about 1000 MW (1 GW) of capacity, we would need 14,500...

What Happens During a Refueling Outage?

You may have noticed over the past few weeks that a number of nuclear plants are shut down for refueling outages or are resuming operations after just returning from one. This type of routine outage usually occurs in the spring or fall when electricity demand is low so that nuclear reactors can replace about one-third of the spent fuel rods with new fuel and conduct other routine maintenance and repairs at the plant. To get a better sense of how refueling works at a nuclear energy facility, I spoke with Marcus Nichol, NEI’s senior project manager for used fuel storage and transportation, and asked him to explain the basics. Why does a nuclear plant need to replace one-third of its fuel? Nichol: The main purpose of a refueling outage is to replace older fuel that is depleted—meaning it can no longer efficiently produce energy from nuclear fission reactions—with new fuel. This “used fuel” has typically been used in the reactor for four-and-a-half to six years before it is pe...

NEI Nuclear Notes

Search This Blog